Abstract
Background
Stillbirth has a profound impact on women, families, and healthcare workers. The burden is highest in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). There is need for respectful and supportive care for women, partners, and families after bereavement.
Objective
To perform a qualitative meta‐summary of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences of care after stillbirth in LMICs.
Search strategy
Search terms were formulated by identifying all synonyms, thesaurus terms, and variations for stillbirth. Databases searched were AMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, BNI, CINAHL.
Selection criteria
Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies that addressed parents’ or healthcare professionals’ experience of care after stillbirth in LMICs.
Data collection and analysis
Studies were screened, and data extracted in duplicate. Data were analysed using the Sandelowski meta‐summary technique that calculates frequency and intensity effect sizes (FES/IES).
Main results
In all, 118 full texts were screened, and 34 studies from 17 countries were included. FES range was 15–68%. Most studies had IES 1.5–4.5. Women experience a broad range of manifestations of grief following stillbirth, which may not be recognised by healthcare workers or in their communities. Lack of recognition exacerbates negative experiences of stigmatisation, blame, devaluation, and loss of social status. Adequately developed health systems, with trained and supported staff, are best equipped to provide the support and information that women want after stillbirth.
Conclusions
Basic interventions could have an immediate impact on the experiences of women and their families after stillbirth. Examples include public education to reduce stigma, promoting the respectful maternity care agenda, and investigating stillbirth appropriately.
Stillbirth has a profound impact on women, families, and healthcare workers. The burden is highest in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). There is need for respectful and supportive care for women, partners, and families after bereavement.
Objective
To perform a qualitative meta‐summary of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences of care after stillbirth in LMICs.
Search strategy
Search terms were formulated by identifying all synonyms, thesaurus terms, and variations for stillbirth. Databases searched were AMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsychINFO, BNI, CINAHL.
Selection criteria
Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method studies that addressed parents’ or healthcare professionals’ experience of care after stillbirth in LMICs.
Data collection and analysis
Studies were screened, and data extracted in duplicate. Data were analysed using the Sandelowski meta‐summary technique that calculates frequency and intensity effect sizes (FES/IES).
Main results
In all, 118 full texts were screened, and 34 studies from 17 countries were included. FES range was 15–68%. Most studies had IES 1.5–4.5. Women experience a broad range of manifestations of grief following stillbirth, which may not be recognised by healthcare workers or in their communities. Lack of recognition exacerbates negative experiences of stigmatisation, blame, devaluation, and loss of social status. Adequately developed health systems, with trained and supported staff, are best equipped to provide the support and information that women want after stillbirth.
Conclusions
Basic interventions could have an immediate impact on the experiences of women and their families after stillbirth. Examples include public education to reduce stigma, promoting the respectful maternity care agenda, and investigating stillbirth appropriately.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology |
| Early online date | 12 Aug 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 17 Sept 2018 |