Party Reputations and Policy Priorities: How Issue Ownership Shapes Executive and Legislative Agendas

Jane Green, William Jennings

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Election-oriented elites are expected to emphasize issues on which their party possesses ‘issue ownership’ during campaigns. This article extends those theories to the content of executive and legislative agendas. Arguing that executives have incentives to pursue their party’s owned issues in the legislature, it theorizes three conditions under which these incentives are constrained: when governments are responsive to issues prioritized by the public, when a party has a stronger electoral mandate and under divided government. The theory is tested using time-series analyses of policy agendas of US congressional statutes and State of the Union addresses (1947–2012) and UK acts of Parliament and the Queen’s Speech (1950–2010). The results offer support for the theory, and are particularly strong for the US State of the Union address, providing insights into institutional differences. The implications provide reassurance concerning the conditions under which governments focus attention only on their partisan issue priorities.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)443-466
JournalBritish Journal of Political Science
Volume49
Issue number2
Early online date30 Mar 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Mar 2017

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Cathie Marsh Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Party Reputations and Policy Priorities: How Issue Ownership Shapes Executive and Legislative Agendas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this