Past-tense generation from form versus meaning: Behavioural data and simulation evidence

Anna M. Woollams, Marc Joanisse, Karalyn Patterson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


    The standard task used to study inflectional processing of verbs involves presentation of the stem form from which the participant is asked to generate the past tense. This task reveals a processing disadvantage for irregular relative to regular English verbs, more pronounced for lower-frequency items. Dual- and single-mechanism theories of inflectional morphology are both able to account for this pattern; but the models diverge in their predictions concerning the magnitude of the regularity effect expected when the task involves past-tense generation from meaning. In this study, we asked normal speakers to generate the past tense from either form (verb stem) or meaning (action picture). The robust regularity effect observed in the standard form condition was no longer reliable when participants were required to generate the past tense from meaning. This outcome would appear problematic for dual-mechanism theories to the extent that they assume the process of inflection requires stem retrieval. By contrast, it supports single-mechanism models that consider stem retrieval to be task-dependent. We present a single-mechanism model of verb inflection incorporating distributed phonological and semantic representations that reproduces this task-dependent pattern. © 2009 Elsevier Inc.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)55-76
    Number of pages21
    JournalJournal of Memory and Language
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009


    • Frequency
    • Inflection
    • Morphology
    • Past tense
    • Regularity
    • Semantics


    Dive into the research topics of 'Past-tense generation from form versus meaning: Behavioural data and simulation evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this