Patient attitudes to intensive care and life-sustaining technology

Redmond P. Tully, Gareth Kitchen, Aseem Tufchi, Bhaskar Saha, Rose Baker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We used a validated questionnaire to explore the views of patients regarding receiving intensive care and life-sustaining technology. Data was obtained from 38 patients. A score was obtained for ‘general attitude towards use of lifesustaining/ prolonging technology’ that varied from 18.9 to 48.5 out of 52, the higher score reflecting a more positive attitude. There was no significant difference between men and women or correlation with age or ASA score. A score for ‘personal desire for life support’ was also obtained, ranging from zero to a maximum possible score of eight, which reflected the most positive view. The median score was 0.5. Women had a significantly lower median score of zero vs 1.5 for men (p=0.022). There was no significant correlation with age or ASA score. There was considerable heterogeneity of views regarding the use of life-sustaining technology. In this study, women were less likely to want intensive medical treatment than men.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)331-335
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of the Intensive Care Society
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2014

Keywords

  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Ethics
  • Intensive care
  • Life support care
  • Mechanical ventilation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient attitudes to intensive care and life-sustaining technology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this