Performance measurement in UK town centre management schemes and US business improvement districts: Comparisons and UK implications

Sophie Hogg; Dominic Medway; Gary Warnaby

doi:10.1068/a38105

Performance measurement in UK town centre management schemes and US business improvement districts: Comparisons and UK implications

Sophie Hogg, Dominic Medway, Gary Warnaby

MSM Marketing

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Performance measurement was introduced in the public sector to evaluate the impact of policy intervention. It has been heavily promoted to UK town centre managers in recent years by the government, retailers, and the Association of Town Centre Management (ATCM). Using data from interviews undertaken with UK town centre managers and business improvement district (BID) managers in the USA during 2002-03, the authors compare and contrast performance measurement in terms of concept, design, and use in these two contexts, as well as considering the issue of 'performance ownership'. Implications for the UK are discussed in the light of the recent introduction of BIDs. © 2007 a Pion publication printed in Great Britain.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1513-1528
Number of pages	15
Journal	Environment and Planning A
Volume	39
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1068/a38105
Publication status	Published - Jun 2007

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1068/a38105

Cite this

@article{036ef80a312c4c32804b1b95c9c16505,

title = "Performance measurement in UK town centre management schemes and US business improvement districts: Comparisons and UK implications",

abstract = "Performance measurement was introduced in the public sector to evaluate the impact of policy intervention. It has been heavily promoted to UK town centre managers in recent years by the government, retailers, and the Association of Town Centre Management (ATCM). Using data from interviews undertaken with UK town centre managers and business improvement district (BID) managers in the USA during 2002-03, the authors compare and contrast performance measurement in terms of concept, design, and use in these two contexts, as well as considering the issue of 'performance ownership'. Implications for the UK are discussed in the light of the recent introduction of BIDs. {\textcopyright} 2007 a Pion publication printed in Great Britain.",

author = "Sophie Hogg and Dominic Medway and Gary Warnaby",

year = "2007",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1068/a38105",

language = "English",

volume = "39",

pages = "1513--1528",

journal = "Environment and Planning A",

issn = "1472-3409",

publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Performance measurement in UK town centre management schemes and US business improvement districts: Comparisons and UK implications

AU - Hogg, Sophie

AU - Medway, Dominic

AU - Warnaby, Gary

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Performance measurement was introduced in the public sector to evaluate the impact of policy intervention. It has been heavily promoted to UK town centre managers in recent years by the government, retailers, and the Association of Town Centre Management (ATCM). Using data from interviews undertaken with UK town centre managers and business improvement district (BID) managers in the USA during 2002-03, the authors compare and contrast performance measurement in terms of concept, design, and use in these two contexts, as well as considering the issue of 'performance ownership'. Implications for the UK are discussed in the light of the recent introduction of BIDs. © 2007 a Pion publication printed in Great Britain.

AB - Performance measurement was introduced in the public sector to evaluate the impact of policy intervention. It has been heavily promoted to UK town centre managers in recent years by the government, retailers, and the Association of Town Centre Management (ATCM). Using data from interviews undertaken with UK town centre managers and business improvement district (BID) managers in the USA during 2002-03, the authors compare and contrast performance measurement in terms of concept, design, and use in these two contexts, as well as considering the issue of 'performance ownership'. Implications for the UK are discussed in the light of the recent introduction of BIDs. © 2007 a Pion publication printed in Great Britain.

U2 - 10.1068/a38105

DO - 10.1068/a38105

M3 - Article

SN - 1472-3409

VL - 39

SP - 1513

EP - 1528

JO - Environment and Planning A

JF - Environment and Planning A

IS - 6

ER -

Performance measurement in UK town centre management schemes and US business improvement districts: Comparisons and UK implications

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this