Phase III randomised trial of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer

S. Baka, R. Califano, R. Ferraldeschi, L. Aschroft, N. Thatcher, P. Taylor, C. Faivre-Finn, F. Blackhall, P. Lorigan

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This randomised trial compared platinum-based to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer (limited or extensive stage) and ≤2 adverse prognostic factors. Patients were randomised to receive six cycles of either ACE (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 i.v., cyclophosphamide 1 g/m2 i.v. and etoposide 120 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, then etoposide 240 mg/m2 orally for 2 days) or PE (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 and etoposide 120 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, then etoposide 240 mg/m2 orally for 2 days) given for every 3 weeks. For patients where cisplatin was not suitable, carboplatin (AUC6) was substituted. A total of 280 patients were included (139 ACE, 141 PE). The response rates were 72% for ACE and 77% for PE. One-year survival rates were 34 and 38% (P=0.497), respectively and 2-year survival was the same (12%) for both arms. For LD patients, the median survival was 10.9 months for ACE and 12.6 months for PE (P
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)442-447
    Number of pages5
    JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
    Volume99
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 5 Aug 2008

    Keywords

    • Chemotherapy
    • Cisplatin
    • Doxorubicin
    • Randomised clinical trial
    • Small-cell lung cancer

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Phase III randomised trial of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy compared with platinum-based chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this