Phosphorylcholine-coated stents in porcine coronary arteries: In vivo assessment of biocompatibility

Aims. To examine the angiographic (quantitative coronary angiography), morphometric, light microscopic (LM) (i.e., histology and immunohistochemical staining) and electron microscopic (EM) findings after implantation of phosphorylcholine (PC)-coated compared to uncoated stents in porcine coronary arteries. Methods. Forty (25 PC-coated, 15 uncoated) divYsio® stents were implanted into the coronary arteries of 20 pigs. Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed pre-stent and post-implantation in fifteen pigs, at 28 days. Two pigs were killed at 5 days (LM and scanning EM), one pig at 14 days (scanning EM) and 17 pigs at 28 days (LM, scanning EM, transmission EM). At 28 days, thirty-two of 34 stented segments excised were formalin-fixed, of which 30 were embedded in resin and sectioned for morphometry and LM. Remaining stents were examined by TEM and SEM. Results. No angiographically occlusive thrombosis occurred in any of the stents. LM at 5 days showed endothelialization of PC-coated and uncoated stents, which was also confirmed by scanning EM at 14 days. At 28 days, QCA and morphometry showed no significant differences between PC-coated and uncoated stents. A few inflammatory cells were seen in both stent types at 5 days but there was no inflammatory or additional tissue reaction to PC-coated compared to uncoated stents at 28 days. Conclusions. The divYsio stents, with or without PC coating, performed equally well in terms of acute patency, 28-day QCA and morphometry. The PC coating allows a stent to endothelialize normally and is not associated with specific histological changes. The PC coating on the divYsio stent appears biocompatible.