TY - JOUR
T1 - Plug-in Electric Vehicle Charging with Multiple Charging Options
T2 - A Systematic Analysis of Service Providers' Pricing Strategies
AU - Zhang, Yanru
AU - Zhou, Yingjie
AU - Jiang, Changkun
AU - Wang, Yan
AU - Zhang, Ruichang
AU - Chen, George
N1 - Funding Information:
Manuscript received November 27, 2019; revised March 16, 2020 and June 17, 2020; accepted July 14, 2020. Date of publication August 28, 2020; date of current version December 21, 2020. The work of Yanru Zhang was supported by UESTC Funds for Outstanding Talents under Grant A1098531023601183. The work of Yingjie Zhou was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 61801315. The work of Changkun Jiang was supported in part by the NSFC under Grant 61902255; in part by the Basic Research Project of Shenzhen Science and Technology Program under Grant JCYJ20190808163417094; in part by the Research Start-Up Foundation of Shenzhen under Grant 827-000415; and in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Shenzhen University under Grant 2019045 and Grant 860-000002110540. Paper no. TSG-01790-2019. (Corresponding author: Yingjie Zhou.) Yanru Zhang, Yan Wang, and Ruichang Zhang are with the College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - In this article, we present the optimal strategy for public plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) charging services with multiple charging options: fast charging service and slow charging service. ThePEV user make decisions by firstly considering the remaining energy, travel distance to charging station, then about the charging prices, charging rates and estimated charging time. To obtain insights of such a highly coupled system, we consider both monopoly and duopoly markets, where the two services are operated by a single service provider (SP) and two different SPs, respectively. For the monopoly market, we propose a three-stage Stackelberg game model. For the duopoly market, we propose a two-stage Bertrand competition and Cournot competition. We provided the SP's optimal pricing strategies and decisions in the monopoly market, and the optimal pricing contract and quantity contract for SPs in the duopoly market with Bertrand competition and Cournot competition. Both the analytical and simulation results show that, in the monopoly market, offering two charging options can potentially improve the SP's profit compared with offering one option only in the monopoly market; while in the duopoly market, it is optimal for SPs to offer the quantity contract rather than the price contract to maximize profits.
AB - In this article, we present the optimal strategy for public plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) charging services with multiple charging options: fast charging service and slow charging service. ThePEV user make decisions by firstly considering the remaining energy, travel distance to charging station, then about the charging prices, charging rates and estimated charging time. To obtain insights of such a highly coupled system, we consider both monopoly and duopoly markets, where the two services are operated by a single service provider (SP) and two different SPs, respectively. For the monopoly market, we propose a three-stage Stackelberg game model. For the duopoly market, we propose a two-stage Bertrand competition and Cournot competition. We provided the SP's optimal pricing strategies and decisions in the monopoly market, and the optimal pricing contract and quantity contract for SPs in the duopoly market with Bertrand competition and Cournot competition. Both the analytical and simulation results show that, in the monopoly market, offering two charging options can potentially improve the SP's profit compared with offering one option only in the monopoly market; while in the duopoly market, it is optimal for SPs to offer the quantity contract rather than the price contract to maximize profits.
KW - bertrand and cournot competition
KW - PEV charging
KW - Stackelberg game
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85098333926
U2 - 10.1109/TSG.2020.3020044
DO - 10.1109/TSG.2020.3020044
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85098333926
SN - 1949-3053
VL - 12
SP - 524
EP - 537
JO - IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
JF - IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid
IS - 1
M1 - 9179771
ER -