Abstract
This article uses the Westminster Model to construct a framework for interpreting the nature of power relations presented in British political memoirs, one that emphasises the role of 'historical impact'. It then argues that the model's ethos has a culture of honourable secrecy and club regulation which conditions the memoirs of politicians and civil servants in contrasting ways. The article examines the current batch of New Labour memoirs and observes that, despite attempts at reform, a culture of club regulation persists. This is evidenced in a detailed case study of David Blunkett's diaries. The article concludes by suggesting that if the legitimising mythology of the Westminster Model is to be sustained by Britain's political elite, then it will require a more robust form of regulation. © 2010 The Authors. British Journal of Politics and International Relations © 2010 Political Studies Association.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 498-522 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | British Journal of Politics and International Relations |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2010 |
Keywords
- David Blunkett
- New Labour
- Political memoirs
- Westminster Model