Political Memoirs and New Labour: Interpretations of Power and the 'Club Rules'

David Richards, Helen Mathers

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This article uses the Westminster Model to construct a framework for interpreting the nature of power relations presented in British political memoirs, one that emphasises the role of 'historical impact'. It then argues that the model's ethos has a culture of honourable secrecy and club regulation which conditions the memoirs of politicians and civil servants in contrasting ways. The article examines the current batch of New Labour memoirs and observes that, despite attempts at reform, a culture of club regulation persists. This is evidenced in a detailed case study of David Blunkett's diaries. The article concludes by suggesting that if the legitimising mythology of the Westminster Model is to be sustained by Britain's political elite, then it will require a more robust form of regulation. © 2010 The Authors. British Journal of Politics and International Relations © 2010 Political Studies Association.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)498-522
Number of pages24
JournalBritish Journal of Politics and International Relations
Volume12
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2010

Keywords

  • David Blunkett
  • New Labour
  • Political memoirs
  • Westminster Model

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Political Memoirs and New Labour: Interpretations of Power and the 'Club Rules''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this