TY - CHAP
T1 - Population Health Management in the NHS
T2 - What Can We Learn from COVID-19?
AU - Checkland, Katherine
AU - Hammond, Jonathan
AU - Spooner, Sharon
PY - 2021/11/9
Y1 - 2021/11/9
N2 - Population health management is an increasingly popular concept in health systems. Driven by growth in ‘big data’, the approach uses aggregated data to identify and manage the health of those deemed ‘at risk’. We use the UK’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic as a lens to critically examine this approach to improving population health, using the policy of ‘shielding’ those at high risk of harm as an exemplar. Firstly, we explore the policy as an example of categorisation, showing that criteria used to identify high-risk population ‘segments’ are never wholly objective, arising out of negotiations taking account of economic, political, or social issues, with the categorization of individuals as in/out of the high-risk group always approximate. Secondly, we consider the construction of risk and demonstrate that focusing on biomedical data brackets out societal factors driving individual risks including deprivation, racial discrimination, and employment status. Finally, we highlight how this framing of COVID-19-associated risk as a biomedical issue leads to a neoliberal focus upon individual rather than societal risk-mitigation approaches. We argue that population health management should be married with traditional public health advocacy and campaigning, digging beneath identified disparities to expose and interrogate the structural factors at work.
AB - Population health management is an increasingly popular concept in health systems. Driven by growth in ‘big data’, the approach uses aggregated data to identify and manage the health of those deemed ‘at risk’. We use the UK’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic as a lens to critically examine this approach to improving population health, using the policy of ‘shielding’ those at high risk of harm as an exemplar. Firstly, we explore the policy as an example of categorisation, showing that criteria used to identify high-risk population ‘segments’ are never wholly objective, arising out of negotiations taking account of economic, political, or social issues, with the categorization of individuals as in/out of the high-risk group always approximate. Secondly, we consider the construction of risk and demonstrate that focusing on biomedical data brackets out societal factors driving individual risks including deprivation, racial discrimination, and employment status. Finally, we highlight how this framing of COVID-19-associated risk as a biomedical issue leads to a neoliberal focus upon individual rather than societal risk-mitigation approaches. We argue that population health management should be married with traditional public health advocacy and campaigning, digging beneath identified disparities to expose and interrogate the structural factors at work.
KW - Pandemic
KW - Corona Virus
KW - healthcare organization
KW - healthcare governance
KW - health management
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82696-3_11
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-82696-3_11
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-82696-3_11
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9783030826956
SN - 9783030826987
T3 - Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare
SP - 225
EP - 244
BT - Organising Care in a Time of Covid-19
A2 - Waring, Justin
A2 - Denis, Jean-Louis
A2 - Reff Pedersen, Anne
A2 - Tenbensel, Tim
PB - Palgrave Macmillan
CY - Cham
ER -