TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-polymerization of dental resin composite evaluated with nanoindentation and micro- Raman spectroscopy
AU - Mohamad, D.
AU - Young, Robert
AU - Mann, A. B.
AU - Watts, D.C.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - The aim of the study was to evaluate post-polymerization of
resin composite by measuring NanoHardness (H), Young’s Modulus (E)
and Degree of Conversion (DC) using nanoindentation and Micro-Raman
spectroscopy. For this purpose a computer-controlled NanoIndenter™ and
a Renishaw 1000 Raman Spectrometer fitted with an Olympus
microscope attachment, operated at 638 nm, were used. A light-activated
resin composite was used in this study, (Z250, 3MESPE). Sub-groups
(n=3) of specimens were irradiated for 20, 30, 40 s. All samples for
nanoindentation were polished metallographically and typically 50 nanoindentations
were performed per specimen. After curing and polishing, half
of the samples were tested immediately (Group 1); the others after being
stored dry at 37 °C for 7 days (Group 2) to allow scope for postpolymerization.
H values ranged from 1.08 to 1.40 GPa for Group 1, and
from 1.64 to1.71 GPa for Group 2. E values in Group 1 ranged from 19.60
to 19.94 GPa and for Group 2, from 21.42 to 22.05 GPa. DC values
ranged from 55 to 66.39%, and 60.90 to 66.47% for Group 1 and Group 2
respectively. All values obtained shown significant different between
Groups 1 and 2 (p<0.05); ie as a result of any (further) monomer postpolymerization.
The consistently greater H, E and DC values in Group 2
suggest that network stabilization may occur partly by mechanisms
supplementary to monomer conversion per se. This could include
annealing of the polymer chain segments.
AB - The aim of the study was to evaluate post-polymerization of
resin composite by measuring NanoHardness (H), Young’s Modulus (E)
and Degree of Conversion (DC) using nanoindentation and Micro-Raman
spectroscopy. For this purpose a computer-controlled NanoIndenter™ and
a Renishaw 1000 Raman Spectrometer fitted with an Olympus
microscope attachment, operated at 638 nm, were used. A light-activated
resin composite was used in this study, (Z250, 3MESPE). Sub-groups
(n=3) of specimens were irradiated for 20, 30, 40 s. All samples for
nanoindentation were polished metallographically and typically 50 nanoindentations
were performed per specimen. After curing and polishing, half
of the samples were tested immediately (Group 1); the others after being
stored dry at 37 °C for 7 days (Group 2) to allow scope for postpolymerization.
H values ranged from 1.08 to 1.40 GPa for Group 1, and
from 1.64 to1.71 GPa for Group 2. E values in Group 1 ranged from 19.60
to 19.94 GPa and for Group 2, from 21.42 to 22.05 GPa. DC values
ranged from 55 to 66.39%, and 60.90 to 66.47% for Group 1 and Group 2
respectively. All values obtained shown significant different between
Groups 1 and 2 (p<0.05); ie as a result of any (further) monomer postpolymerization.
The consistently greater H, E and DC values in Group 2
suggest that network stabilization may occur partly by mechanisms
supplementary to monomer conversion per se. This could include
annealing of the polymer chain segments.
M3 - Article
SN - 1823-8602
JO - Archives of Orofacial Sciences
JF - Archives of Orofacial Sciences
ER -