Poverty Reduction during the Rural-Urban Transformation: Rural Development is still more important than Urbanisation

Katsushi Imai, Raghav Gaiha, Alessandra Garbero

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

185 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Based on cross-country panel datasets, we find that (i) an increase in population share in agriculture is associated with poverty reduction once the longer- term poverty change or the dynamic is taken into account; (ii) rural non-agricultural sector also is poverty reducing in some cases; and (iii) increased population in the mega cities has no role in poverty reduction. In fact, the growth of population in mega cities is “poverty-increasing” in a few cases. Given that a rapid population growth or rural-urban migration is likely to increase poverty, more emphasis should be placed on policies that enhance support for rural agricultural and non-agricultural sectors. If our analysis has any validity, doubts are raised about recent research emphasising the role of secondary towns or urbanisation as the main driver of extreme poverty reduction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2118-2144
JournalJournal of Policy Modeling
Volume39
Issue number6
Early online date20 Oct 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Inequality, Poverty, Growth, Agriculture, Non-agriculture

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Global Development Institute

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Poverty Reduction during the Rural-Urban Transformation: Rural Development is still more important than Urbanisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this