Abstract
Based on cross-country panel datasets, we find that (i) an increase in population share in agriculture is associated with poverty reduction once the longer- term poverty change or the dynamic is taken into account; (ii) rural non-agricultural sector also is poverty reducing in some cases; and (iii) increased population in the mega cities has no role in poverty reduction. In fact, the growth of population in mega cities is “poverty-increasing” in a few cases. Given that a rapid population growth or rural-urban migration is likely to increase poverty, more emphasis should be placed on policies that enhance support for rural agricultural and non-agricultural sectors. If our analysis has any validity, doubts are raised about recent research emphasising the role of secondary towns or urbanisation as the main driver of extreme poverty reduction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2118-2144 |
| Journal | Journal of Policy Modeling |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| Early online date | 20 Oct 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 1 No Poverty
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Keywords
- Inequality, Poverty, Growth, Agriculture, Non-agriculture
Research Highlights, Institutes and Platforms
- Global Development Institute
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Poverty Reduction during the Rural-Urban Transformation: Rural Development is still more important than Urbanisation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver