Pragmatic RAndomised controlled trial of a trauma-focused guided self-help Programme versus Individual trauma-focused cognitive Behavioural therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (RAPID): Trial protocol

Claire Nollett*, Catrin Lewis, Neil Kitchiner, Neil Roberts, Katy Addison, Lucy Brookes-Howell, Sarah Cosgrove, Katherine Cullen, Anke Ehlers, Sarah Heke, Mark Kelson, Karina Lovell, Kim Madden, Kirsten McEwan, Rachel McNamara, Ceri Phillips, Timothy Pickles, Natalie Simon, Jonathan Bisson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: There is good evidence that trauma-focused therapies for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder are effective. However, they are not always feasible to deliver due a shortage of trained therapists and demands on the patient. An online trauma-focused Guided Self-Help (GSH) programme which could overcome these barriers has shown promise in a pilot study. This study will be the first to evaluate GSH against standard face-to-face therapy to assess its suitability for use in the NHS. Methods: The study is a large-scale multi-centre pragmatic randomised controlled non-inferiority trial, with assessors masked to treatment allocation. One hundred and ninety-two participants will be randomly allocated to receive either face-to-face trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy (TFCBT) or trauma-focused online guided self-help (GSH). The primary outcome will be the severity of symptoms of PTSD over the previous week as measured by the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale for DSM5 (CAPS-5) at 16 weeks post-randomisation. Secondary outcome measures include PTSD symptoms over the previous month as measured by the CAPS-5 at 52 weeks plus the Impact of Event Scale - revised (IES-R), Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Alcohol Use Disorders Test (AUDIT-O), Multidimensional Scale for Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), short Post-Traumatic Cognitions Inventory (PTCI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) and General Self Efficacy Scale (GSES) measured at 16 and 52 weeks post-randomisation. Changes in health-related quality of life will be measured by the EQ-5D and the level of healthcare resource utilisation for health economic analysis will be determined by an amended version of the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory European Version. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) will be collected at 16 weeks post-randomisation to evaluate treatment satisfaction. Discussion: This study will be the first to compare online GSH with usual face-to-face therapy for PTSD. The strengths are that it will test a rigorously developed intervention in a real world setting to inform NHS commissioning. The potential challenges of delivering such a pragmatic study may include participant recruitment, retention and adherence, therapist retention, and fidelity of intervention delivery.

Original languageEnglish
Article number77
JournalBMC Psychiatry
Volume18
Issue number1
Early online date27 Mar 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

Keywords

  • Guided self-help
  • Internet
  • Intervention
  • Online
  • Post-traumatic stress disorder
  • Protocol
  • PTSD
  • Randomised controlled trial
  • RCT
  • Trauma focused

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pragmatic RAndomised controlled trial of a trauma-focused guided self-help Programme versus Individual trauma-focused cognitive Behavioural therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder (RAPID): Trial protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this