Pragmatic trials of complex psychosocial interventions: Methodological challenges

G. Dunn

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Having first introduced the pragmatic health care trial, the discussion then focuses on a selected list of technical problems that are important for the design, analysis and inference from such trials. The first is lack of independence of participants' outcomes do to clustering either arising from a cluster randomized design or to the way treatment is delivered (therapist and group effects). The second and third concern the implications of non-adherence to treatment and subsequent loss to follow-up, particularly, when non-adherence is associated with missing outcome data. Finally, it is argued that pragmatism and a desire for a scientific explanation should not be regarded as mutually exclusive. Copyright © 2013 Cambridge University Press.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)105-109
    Number of pages4
    JournalEpidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
    Volume22
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2013

    Keywords

    • intention-to-treat-analysis
    • pragmatic trials
    • psychosocial interventions
    • statistics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Pragmatic trials of complex psychosocial interventions: Methodological challenges'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this