Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


This paper concerns the issue of whether the so-called left wing of the Vienna Circle (Carnap, Neurath, Frank) can be understood as having provided the blueprint for a bipartite metatheory with a formal-logical part (the "logic of science") supporting and being supported by a naturalistic-empirical part (the "behavioristics of science"). A claim to this effect was recently met by a counterclaim that there was indeed an attempt made to broaden Carnap's formalist conception of philosophy by the pragmatist Morris, but that this initiative failed and that Carnap showed no interest in it. To defend the original claim this paper provides an analysis of Carnap and Morris on the subject matter of pragmatics in order to show that and how Carnap adopted Morris's proposals in so far as they agreed with bipartite metatheory conception. © 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)523-546
Number of pages23
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2013


Dive into the research topics of 'Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this