TY - JOUR
T1 - PREDICT-GTN 2: Two-factor streamlined models match FIGO performance in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
AU - Parker, Victoria L.
AU - Winter, Matthew C.
AU - Tidy, John A.
AU - Palmer, Julia E.
AU - Sarwar, Naveed
AU - Singh, Kamaljit
AU - Aguiar, Xianne
AU - Hancock, Barry W.
AU - Pacey, Allan A.
AU - Seckl, Michael J.
AU - Harrison, Robert F.
PY - 2024/1/1
Y1 - 2024/1/1
N2 - Objective: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) scoring system uses the sum of eight risk-factors to predict single-agent chemotherapy resistance in Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN). To improve ease of use, this study aimed to generate: (i) streamlined models that match FIGO performance and; (ii) visual-decision aids (nomograms) for guiding management. Methods: Using training (n = 4191) and validation datasets (n = 144) of GTN patients from two UK specialist centres, logistic regression analysis generated two-factor models for cross-validation and exploration. Performance was assessed using true and false positive rate, positive and negative predictive values, Bland-Altman calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision-curve analysis (DCA) and contingency tables. Nomograms were developed from estimated model parameters and performance cross-checked upon the training and validation dataset. Results: Three streamlined, two-factor models were selected for analysis: (i) M1, pre-treatment hCG + history of failed chemotherapy; (ii) M2, pre-treatment hCG + site of metastases and; (iii) M3, pre-treatment hCG + number of metastases. Using both training and validation datasets, these models showed no evidence of significant discordance from FIGO (McNemar's test p > 0.78) or across a range of performance parameters. This behaviour was maintained when applying algorithms simulating the logic of the nomograms. Conclusions: Our streamlined models could be used to assess GTN patients and replace FIGO, statistically matching performance. Given the importance of imaging parameters in guiding treatment, M2 and M3 are favoured for ongoing validation. In resource-poor countries, where access to specialist centres is problematic, M1 could be pragmatically implemented. Further prospective validation on a larger cohort is recommended.
AB - Objective: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) scoring system uses the sum of eight risk-factors to predict single-agent chemotherapy resistance in Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia (GTN). To improve ease of use, this study aimed to generate: (i) streamlined models that match FIGO performance and; (ii) visual-decision aids (nomograms) for guiding management. Methods: Using training (n = 4191) and validation datasets (n = 144) of GTN patients from two UK specialist centres, logistic regression analysis generated two-factor models for cross-validation and exploration. Performance was assessed using true and false positive rate, positive and negative predictive values, Bland-Altman calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision-curve analysis (DCA) and contingency tables. Nomograms were developed from estimated model parameters and performance cross-checked upon the training and validation dataset. Results: Three streamlined, two-factor models were selected for analysis: (i) M1, pre-treatment hCG + history of failed chemotherapy; (ii) M2, pre-treatment hCG + site of metastases and; (iii) M3, pre-treatment hCG + number of metastases. Using both training and validation datasets, these models showed no evidence of significant discordance from FIGO (McNemar's test p > 0.78) or across a range of performance parameters. This behaviour was maintained when applying algorithms simulating the logic of the nomograms. Conclusions: Our streamlined models could be used to assess GTN patients and replace FIGO, statistically matching performance. Given the importance of imaging parameters in guiding treatment, M2 and M3 are favoured for ongoing validation. In resource-poor countries, where access to specialist centres is problematic, M1 could be pragmatically implemented. Further prospective validation on a larger cohort is recommended.
KW - FIGO
KW - Gestational trophoblastic disease
KW - Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia
KW - Refine
KW - Streamline
KW - Two-factor model
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85179782417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/8b8a76e8-d34d-334a-83f8-5d1d7de4fe0d/
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.017
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.017
M3 - Article
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 180
SP - 152
EP - 159
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
ER -