TY - JOUR
T1 - PREDICTABILITY BETWEEN OBJECTIVE PHYSICAL FACTORS OF FABRICS AND SUBJECTIVE PREFERENCE VOTES FOR DERIVED GARMENTS
AU - Li, Y
AU - Keighley, J H
AU - McIntyre, J E
AU - Hampton, I F G
N1 - LI, Y KEIGHLEY, JH MCINTYRE, JE HAMPTON, IFG
PY - 1991
Y1 - 1991
N2 - The relationships have been investigated between subjective preference votes, collected under three different conditions, for garments derived from a range of fabric materials and objective physical factors (where "factors" are grouped properties) measured for the same materials. The technique of canonical correlation analysis was applied, and three canonical correlations between subjective preference votes and objective physical factors were found to be highly significant (P <0.0001, r > 0.950). Canonical redundancy analysis showed that the objective physical factors of fabrics had great predictive power for the subjective votes, with cumulative redundancy over 0.983. The subjective preference votes, however, were poor predictors for the physical factors of fabrics, with cumulative redundancy only 0.467. The squared multiple correlations suggested that the first three canonical variables of the objective factors of fabrics had very good predictive power for all three subjective preference votes, but the first three canonical variables of the subjective preference votes showed good predictive power only for fabric roughness and fullness and for fabric wettability, not for other objective factors.
AB - The relationships have been investigated between subjective preference votes, collected under three different conditions, for garments derived from a range of fabric materials and objective physical factors (where "factors" are grouped properties) measured for the same materials. The technique of canonical correlation analysis was applied, and three canonical correlations between subjective preference votes and objective physical factors were found to be highly significant (P <0.0001, r > 0.950). Canonical redundancy analysis showed that the objective physical factors of fabrics had great predictive power for the subjective votes, with cumulative redundancy over 0.983. The subjective preference votes, however, were poor predictors for the physical factors of fabrics, with cumulative redundancy only 0.467. The squared multiple correlations suggested that the first three canonical variables of the objective factors of fabrics had very good predictive power for all three subjective preference votes, but the first three canonical variables of the subjective preference votes showed good predictive power only for fabric roughness and fullness and for fabric wettability, not for other objective factors.
U2 - 10.1080/00405009108659210
DO - 10.1080/00405009108659210
M3 - Article
SN - 0040-5000
VL - 82
SP - 277
EP - 284
JO - Journal of the Textile Institute
JF - Journal of the Textile Institute
IS - 3
ER -