Predicting repeat self-harm in children: How accurate can we expect to be?

Prathiba Chitsabesan, Richard Harrington, Valerie Harrington, Barbara Tomenson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The main objective of the study was to find which variables predict repetition of deliberate self-harm in children. The study is based on a group of children who took part in a randomized control trial investigating the effects of a home-based family intervention for children who had deliberately poisoned themselves. These children had a range of baseline and outcome measures collected on two occasions (two and six months follow-up). Outcome data were collected from 149 (92 %) of the initial 162 children over the six months. Twenty-three children made a further deliberate self-harm attempt within the follow-up period. A number of variables at baseline were found to be significantly associated with repeat self-harm. Parental mental health and a history of previous attempts were the strongest predictors. A model of prediction of further deliberate self-harm combining these significant individual variables produced a high positive predictive value (86 %) but had low sensitivity (28 %). Predicting repeat self-harm in children is difficult, even with a comprehensive series of assessments over multiple time points, and we need to adapt services with this in mind. We propose a model of service provision which takes these findings into account.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)23-29
    Number of pages6
    JournalEuropean Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
    Volume12
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Keywords

    • Children
    • Prediction
    • Repeat self-harm
    • Risk factors

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting repeat self-harm in children: How accurate can we expect to be?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this