Predicting stochastic search algorithm performance using landscape state machines

William Rowe, David Corne, Joshua Knowles

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

    Abstract

    A Landscape State Machine (LSM) is a Markov model describing the transition probabilities between the fitness 'levels' of an optimization problem, when a given neighbourhood (or mutation) operator is applied. Although most optimization problems cannot be modeled precisely by an LSM, an approximate LSM can always be constructed by sampling, and can be used, subsequently, in place of real fitness evaluations in order to model the performance of any search algorithm using the given neighbourhood operator. In this paper, we provide empirical evidence that (a) LSMs constructed by simulated annealing-based sampling of a problem landscape make accurate models in few evaluations; (b) LSMs can accurately rank the performance of diverse algorithms including EAs with/without niching and SA; (c) the LSM approach works on diverse problems from MAX-SAT to NKp; (d) convergence of the LSM can be used as a guide to stopping the sampling phase; and, (e) a single LSM constructed using a low mutationrate sample is sufficient to accurately rank the performance of search algorithms run at multiples of this mutation rate.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publication2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2006
    Pages2944-2951
    Number of pages8
    Publication statusPublished - 2006
    Event2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2006 - Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Duration: 16 Jul 200621 Jul 2006

    Publication series

    Name2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2006

    Conference

    Conference2006 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2006
    Country/TerritoryCanada
    CityVancouver, BC
    Period16/07/0621/07/06

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting stochastic search algorithm performance using landscape state machines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this