Prediction of appropriate timing of palliative care for older adults with non-malignant life-threatening disease: A systematic review

Peter A. Coventry, Gunn E. Grande, David A. Richards, Chris J. Todd

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    212 Downloads (Pure)


    Background: Most people in contemporary western society die of the chronic diseases of old age. Whilst palliative care is appropriate for elderly patients with chronic, non-malignant disease, few of these patients access such care compared with cancer patients. Objective referral criteria based on accurate estimation of survival may facilitate more timely referral of non-cancer patients most appropriate for specialist palliative care. Objective: To identify tools and predictor variables that might aid clinicians estimate survival and assess palliative status in non-cancer patients aged 65 years and older. Methods: Systematic review and quality assessment using criteria modified from the literature. Results: 11 studies that evaluated prognoses in hospitalised and community-based older adults with non-malignant disease were identified. Key generic predictors of survival were increased dependency of activities of daily living, presence of comorbidities, poor nutritional status and weight loss, and abnormal vital signs and laboratory values. Disease-specific predictors of survival were identified for dementia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder and congestive heart failure. No study evaluated the relationship between survival and palliative status. Conclusion: Prognostic models that attempt to estimate survival of ≤6 months in non-cancer patients have generally poor discrimination, reflecting the unpredictable nature of most non-malignant disease. However, a number of generic and disease-specific predictor variables were identified that may help clinicians identify older, non-cancer patients with poor prognoses and palliative care needs. Simple, well-validated prognostic models that provide clinicians with objective measures of palliative status in non-cancer patients are needed. Additionally, research that evaluates the effect of general and specialist palliative care on psychosocial outcomes in non-cancer patients and their carers is needed. © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)218-227
    Number of pages9
    JournalAge and Ageing
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - May 2005


    • Chronic disease
    • Elderly
    • Non-cancer
    • Palliative care
    • Prognosis


    Dive into the research topics of 'Prediction of appropriate timing of palliative care for older adults with non-malignant life-threatening disease: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this