Abstract
This study questions the basic assumption that prescriptive methods for nonlinear, wide dynamic range compression (WDRC) hearing aids should restore overall loudness to normal. Fifteen normal-hearing listeners and twenty-four hearing-impaired listeners (with mild to moderate hearing loss, twelve with and twelve without hearing aid experience) participated in laboratory tests. The participants first watched and listened to video sequences and rated how loud and how interesting the situations were. For the hearing-impaired participants, gain was applied according to the NAL-NL1 prescription. Despite the fact that the NAL-NL1 prescription led to less than normal overall calculated loudness, according to the loudness model of Moore and Glasberg (1997), the hearing-impaired participants rated loudness higher than the normal-hearing participants. The participants then adjusted a volume control to preferred overall loudness. Both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired participants preferred less than normal overall calculated loudness. The results from the two groups of hearing-impaired listeners did not differ significantly.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2-11 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | International Journal of Audiology |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2006 |
Keywords
- Hearing aid experience
- Impaired hearing
- Laboratory test
- Normal hearing
- Normal overall loudness