TY - JOUR
T1 - Prefigurative Politics and Social Movement Strategy
T2 - The Roles of Prefiguration in the Reproduction, Mobilisation and Coordination of Movements
AU - Yates, Luke
N1 - Funding Information:
Part of this work was conducted during a funded Hallsworth fellowship at the University of Manchester. My thanks to the fellowship, to the Department of Sociology and the Sustainable Consumption Institute at the University of Manchester and to Kevin Gillan and Dan Welch for comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Thanks also to the organisers and participants of two workshops: ‘Prefiguration in Contemporary Activism’ at the University of Manchester in 2014, and ‘Practices of Material Participation’ at the University of Siegen in 2017. All errors are my own.
Funding Information:
Part of this work was conducted during a funded Hallsworth fellowship at the University of Manchester. My thanks to the fellowship, to the Department of Sociology and the Sustainable Consumption Institute at the University of Manchester and to Kevin Gillan and Dan Welch for comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Thanks also to the organisers and participants of two workshops: ‘Prefiguration in Contemporary Activism’ at the University of Manchester in 2014, and ‘Practices of Material Participation’ at the University of Siegen in 2017. All errors are my own. The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - Recent work historicises and theoretically refines the concept of prefigurative politics. Yet disagreements over the question of whether or how it is politically effective remain. What roles does prefiguration play in strategies of transformation, and what implications does it have for understandings of strategy? The article begins to answer this question by tracking the concept’s use, from discussions of left strategy in the 1960s, a qualifier of new social movements in the 1980s–1990s, its application to protest events in the 2000s, to its contemporary proliferation of meanings. This contextualises reflections on the changing arguments about the roles of prefiguration in social movement strategy. Based on literature about strategy, three essential categories of applied movement strategy are identified: reproduction, mobilisation and coordination. Prefigurative dynamics are part of all three, showing that the reproduction of movements is strategically significant, while the coordination of movements can take various ‘prefigurative’ forms.
AB - Recent work historicises and theoretically refines the concept of prefigurative politics. Yet disagreements over the question of whether or how it is politically effective remain. What roles does prefiguration play in strategies of transformation, and what implications does it have for understandings of strategy? The article begins to answer this question by tracking the concept’s use, from discussions of left strategy in the 1960s, a qualifier of new social movements in the 1980s–1990s, its application to protest events in the 2000s, to its contemporary proliferation of meanings. This contextualises reflections on the changing arguments about the roles of prefiguration in social movement strategy. Based on literature about strategy, three essential categories of applied movement strategy are identified: reproduction, mobilisation and coordination. Prefigurative dynamics are part of all three, showing that the reproduction of movements is strategically significant, while the coordination of movements can take various ‘prefigurative’ forms.
KW - coordination
KW - prefigurative politics
KW - reproduction
KW - strategy
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/fdcb5e81-fe95-3aec-8106-93b29e8ecb4c/
U2 - 10.1177/0032321720936046
DO - 10.1177/0032321720936046
M3 - Article
SN - 0032-3217
VL - 69
SP - 1033
EP - 1052
JO - Political Studies
JF - Political Studies
IS - 4
ER -