Prescribing unapproved medical devices? The case of DIY artificial pancreas systems

Joseph T.F. Roberts, Victoria Moore, Muireann Quigley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


In response to slow progress regarding technological innovations to manage type 1 diabetes, some patients have created unregulated do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems (DIY APS). Yet both in the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally, there is an almost complete lack of specific guidance – legal, regulatory, or ethical – for clinicians caring for DIY APS users. Uncertainty regarding their professional obligations has led to them being cautious about discussing DIY APS with patients, let alone recommending or prescribing them. In this article, we argue that this approach threatens to undermine trust and transparency. Analysing the professional guidance from the UK regulator – the General Medical Council – we demonstrate that nothing within it ought to be interpreted as precluding clinicians from initiating discussions about DIY APS. Moreover, in some circumstances, it may require that clinicians do so. We also argue that the guidance does not preclude clinicians from prescribing such unapproved medical devices.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-68
Number of pages27
JournalMedical Law International
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 12 Mar 2021


  • Do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems
  • General Medical Council
  • diabetes
  • doctor–patient relationship
  • informed consent
  • prescription
  • professional regulation
  • trust
  • unapproved medical devices


Dive into the research topics of 'Prescribing unapproved medical devices? The case of DIY artificial pancreas systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this