Priority and Unity in Frege and Wittgenstein

Oliver Spinney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In the following article I intend to examine the problem of the unity of the proposition in Russell, Frege, and Wittgenstein. My chief aim will be to draw attention to the distinction between Russell’s conception of propositional constituents, on the one hand, with Frege and Wittgenstein’s on the other. My focus will be on Russell’s view of terms as independent, propositions being built up out of these building blocks, compared with Frege and Wittgenstein’s ‘top down’ approach. Furthermore, I will argue that, contra certain other commentators, Frege’s metaphor of saturation and unsaturation does not serve as a solution to the problem of unity, and that the extension of this metaphorical language to Wittgenstein is, therefore, inappropriate.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal for the History of Analytical Philosophy
Volume6
Issue number5
Publication statusPublished - 13 Apr 2018

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Priority and Unity in Frege and Wittgenstein'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this