Probabilistic machine learning based soft-sensors for product quality prediction in batch processes

M. Mowbray, H. Kay, S. Kay, P. Castro Caetano, A. Hicks, C. Mendoza, A. Lane, P. Martin, D. Zhang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The major promise of the 4th industrial revolution is encompassed by the utilization of real-time process data to inform operational decision-making. Research focus relating to the monitoring of batch process end product qualities has typically been dominated by the use of latent variable models. In this work, we combined latent variable modeling with probabilistic machine learning methods to construct novel soft-sensors, which are able to synchronously capture nonlinearities expressed within process data, as well as identify accurate uncertainty estimates for predictions. Specifically, we explored the combination of multiway projection to latent structures (MPLS) with Gaussian processes (GPs), Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) and heteroscedastic noise neural networks (HNNs). We demonstrated performance of the soft-sensors for industrial batch process quality control, which involves estimating the end viscosity of different variants of a non-newtonian liquid product manufactured over different periods. Through experimental validation, it is concluded that the use of the MPLS-HNN soft-sensor provides particular promise for industrial batch process monitoring given its high accuracy and reliability, as well as ease for practical implementation.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104616
JournalChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems
Volume228
Early online date16 Jul 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Sept 2022

Keywords

  • Data analytics
  • Machine learning
  • Process monitoring
  • Quality control
  • Robust soft-sensor
  • Uncertainty estimation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Probabilistic machine learning based soft-sensors for product quality prediction in batch processes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this