Abstract
A process that prīorītīzes cooperative learning and group-management of tasks as a key vehicle of delivery, PBL seems ideally suited to a discipline such as Literary Studies that works so much through discussion and debate, with a relative lack of clear target responses to questions. It might even be argued that the current dominance of tutor-directed models within Literary Studies actually runs counter to the real nature of the subject. A literary text seldom, if ever, has a single issue or problem as its concern, even when a critic or even the author claims that it does. There will always be a diversity of potential response generated among diverse readers. It is arguably in the apprehension of this diversity that the true creativity of the subject lies. A PBL method, in which it is the group itself that defines the learning objectives, tasks and methods of inquiry, seems particularly appropriate. Copyright © 2002, sage publications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 73-83 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Arts and Humanities in Higher Education |
Volume | 1 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2002 |
Keywords
- Facilitation
- Literary studies
- Problem-based learning
- Skills development