Abstract
Weinvestigatedtheperceivedvalueofgovernmentprogramsonearly- childhood development as a means of reducing childhood poverty. We incorpo- rated preferences for the process as well as the outcome by developing two stated- preference survey instruments. One survey directly elicited respondents’ willing- ness to pay specifically for high-quality, intensive, early-childhood development programs at federal and state levels. A second survey elicited respondents’ pref- erences for increasing or decreasing taxes and reallocating expenditures between other government programs and early-childhood programs. We found that respon- dents cared greatly about how childhood poverty was reduced, not just reducing poverty per se. The perceived effectiveness of a program and ideological perspec- tive were found to be important determinants of preferences for a poverty-reduction program. Respondents across all groups, including conservatives and respondents who perceived the effectiveness of early-childhood programs to be low, were not in favor of reducing the early-childhood program.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 373-399 |
Number of pages | 27 |
Journal | Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis |
Volume | 7 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 18 Aug 2016 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Oct 2016 |