Abstract
There is a consensus that urban development schemes in India bear little resemblance to the well-thought-out plans of their genesis, and that the boundary between formal/informal is often blurry. I seek to contribute to this literature by showing how, in spite of efforts to implement a regulatory scheme, street hawking in Delhi remains highly informal and in a state of negotiated (im)permanence. I compare two recent conflicts over street hawkers’ use of public space, which demonstrate that power is dispersed across a range of sites and rests with a number of state and non-state actors. I argue that preconceived notions of ‘formality’ and ‘informality’ are of little value in understanding urban processes, and instead it is necessary to understand how the boundary between formal/informal is produced and contested both juridically and through everyday practices of enforcement and evasion/subversion.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2596-2612 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | Urban Studies |
Volume | 51 |
Issue number | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2014 |
Keywords
- Asia
- Delhi
- geography
- governance
- livelihoods
- street hawking
- urban informality
- urban politics
- urbanization and developing countries
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Global inequalities
- Global Development Institute