Prognostic Importance of Lymph Node (LN) yield after Curative Resection of GastroEnteroPancreatic NeuroEndocrineTumours (GEP NETs)

Jaseela Chiramel, Rose Almond, Astrid E Slagter, Adeel Khan, KHJ Lim, Bipasha Chakrabarty, AnnaM Minicozzi, Angela Lamarca, Was Mansoor, Richard Hubner, Juan W Valle, Mairead Mcnamara

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractpeer-review

Abstract

Background Surgery is the main stay of treatment for GEP NETs, but there is no consensus on optimal number of resected LNs. The effect of LN status and yield on relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients (pts) with resected GEP NETs were evaluated. Methods Data on pts who underwent curative resection for GEP-NETs (Jan 02-Mar 17) were retrospectively analysed. Grade III tumours (Ki67>20%) were excluded. Kaplan-Meier and univariate/multivariable Cox-proportional hazard analyses were performed. Cut-point analysis was assessed to distinguish a binary categorisation of total LNs retrieved associated with RFS. Results Of 217 pts, median (med) age was 59 yrs: 51% male. Primary tumour sites: small bowel (42%), pancreas (25%), appendix (18%), rectum (7%), colon (3%), gastric (2%), others (2%); grade 1 (G1): 77%, G2: 23%. LN cut-point value associated with RFS was 8; ≥8 LNs were retrieved in 106 pts, <8 in 45, and 0 or no record/documentation of LN retrieval in 66. Relapse was reported in 50 pts; 35 deaths. Med follow up times for all pts were 41 months (95% CI 36-51) and 71 months (95% CI 63–76) for RFS and OS respectively. On univariate analysis, there was no effect of LN ratio (number involved/number retrieved) on RFS: p = 0.1 or OS: p = 0.75. On univariate analysis, tumour necrosis (p = 0.021) and perineural infiltration (p = 0.016) were the only two variables significantly associated with OS; G (p = 1), TNM staging (p = 0.19) and surgical margin (p = 0.69) were not significantly associated with OS. Multivariable analysis for RFS included 4 variables of interest: perineural infiltration, LNs retrieved, positive LNs and localisation (Table).Table: 1325P Perineural infiltration: HR 1.46 (95% CI 0.74 - 2.69) p=0.277 ≥8 lymph nodes retrieved: HR 2.70 (95% CI 1.07 - 6.84) p=0.036 Any lymph nodes positive: HR 2.71 (95% CI 0.88 - 8.30) p=0.081 Pancreas (relative to 'other'): HR 27.33 (95% CI 2.54 - 294.08) p=0.006 Small Bowel (relative to 'other'): HR 32.44 (95% CI 2.92 - 360.58) p=0.005 Conclusions Removal of ≥ 8 LNs is associated with greater risk of relapse in G1 & G2 GEP NETs; localisation also has a significant association with RFS, necessitating stricter surveillance. Larger prospective studies are required to validate these findings.
Original languageEnglish
Pagesviii467-viii478
Publication statusPublished - 21 Oct 2018
EventESMO 2018 - Munich, Germany
Duration: 19 Oct 201823 Oct 2018

Conference

ConferenceESMO 2018
Country/TerritoryGermany
CityMunich
Period19/10/1823/10/18

Keywords

  • Neuroendocrine tumour
  • Resection
  • Lymph node
  • Prognosis

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prognostic Importance of Lymph Node (LN) yield after Curative Resection of GastroEnteroPancreatic NeuroEndocrineTumours (GEP NETs)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this