Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts

D Matthews, EV Lieven, Anna Theakston, MM. Tomasello

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This study tests accounts of co-reference errors whereby children allow "Mama Bear" and "her" to co-refer in sentences like "Mama Bear is washing her" (Chien and Wexler, Language Acquisition 1: 225-295, 1990). 63 children aged 4;6, 5;6 and 6;6 participated in a truth-value judgment task augmented with a sentence production component. There were three major finding: 1) contrary to predictions of most generativist accounts, children accepted co-reference even in cases of bound anaphora e.g., "Every girl is washing her" 2) contrary to Thornton and Wexler (Principle B, VP Ellipsis and Interpretation in Child Grammar, The MIT Press, 1999), errors did not appear to occur because children understood referring expressions to be denoting the same person in different guises 3) contrary to usage-based accounts, errors were less likely in sentences that contained lower as opposed to higher frequency verbs. Error rates also differed significantly according to pronoun type ("him", "her", "them"). These challenging results are discussed in terms of possible processing explanations. © 2009 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)599-626
    Number of pages27
    JournalCognitive Linguistics
    Volume20
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2009

    Keywords

    • Anaphora
    • Binding
    • Frequency
    • Language acquisition
    • Pronouns
    • Quantifiers
    • Truth-value judgment task

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Pronoun co-referencing errors: Challenges for generativist and usage-based accounts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this