Property, Territory, Sovereignty: the justification of political boundaries

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

How can political boundaries be justified? My main aim in this chapter is to explore the territorial dimensions of early modern accounts of sovereignty. In so doing, however, my approach is deliberately both historical and normative. Tracing the historical lineage of state territoriality helps shed light, I believe, on contemporary struggles over political boundaries. Why care about excavating a principle of territoriality in the first place? It has become almost a commonplace of contemporary political science and political philosophy that we live in an increasingly de-territorialised world, given the intensification of the forces of globalisation. But political boundaries remain and are fought over. If sovereignty is being increasingly dispersed and as a result boundaries blurred, then we still need an account of the nature of these emergent boundaries, of the forms of re-territorialisation taking place. One step along that path is to understand the conceptual tools we have inherited and which continue to shape our thinking about the relation between sovereignty and territory.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationNatural Law and Civil Sovereignty
Subtitle of host publicationMoral Right and State Authority in Early Modern Political Thought
EditorsIan Hunter, David Saunders
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan Ltd
Pages219-234
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781403919533
ISBN (Print)9781349428090
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2002

Keywords

  • natural law
  • property
  • sovereignty
  • rights
  • authority
  • Thomas Hobbes
  • John Locke

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Property, Territory, Sovereignty: the justification of political boundaries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this