PROSPECT: 4- and 6-year follow-up of a randomised trial of surgery for vaginal prolapse

Fiona M. Reid, Lorna Aucott, Cathryn M. A. Glazener, Andrew Elders, Christine Hemming, Kevin G. Cooper, Robert M. Freeman, Anthony R. B. Smith, Suzanne Hagen, Mary Kilonzo, Dwayne Boyers, Graeme MacLennan, John Norrie, Suzanne Breeman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Introduction and hypothesis: Our aim was to compare the mid-term results of native tissue, biological xenograft and polypropylene mesh surgery for women with vaginal wall prolapse. Methods: A total of 1348 women undergoing primary transvaginal repair of an anterior and/or posterior prolapse were recruited between January 2010 and August 2013 from 35 UK centres. They were randomised by remote allocation to native tissue surgery, biological xenograft or polypropylene mesh. We performed both 4- and 6-year follow-up using validated patient-reported outcome measures. Results: At 4 and 6 years post-operation, there was no clinically important difference in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score for any of the treatments. Using a strict composite outcome to assess functional cure at 6 years, we found no difference in cure among the three types of surgery. Half the women were cured at 6 years but only 10.3 to 12% of women had undergone further surgery for prolapse. However, 8.4% of women in the mesh group had undergone further surgery for mesh complications. There was no difference in the incidence of chronic pain or dyspareunia between groups. Conclusions: At the mid-term outcome of 6 years, there is no benefit from augmenting primary prolapse repairs with polypropylene mesh inlays or biological xenografts. There was no evidence that polypropylene mesh inlays caused greater pain or dyspareunia than native tissue repairs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)67-78
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Urogynecology Journal
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 26 Aug 2022


  • Polypropylene mesh
  • Prolapse
  • Randomised trial
  • Xenograft

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre


Dive into the research topics of 'PROSPECT: 4- and 6-year follow-up of a randomised trial of surgery for vaginal prolapse'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this