@article{ba8f84f7b719476a8bf03030a8175b63,
title = "Protocol for tumour-focused dose-escalated adaptive radiotherapy for the radical treatment of bladder cancer in a multicentre phase II randomised controlled trial (RAIDER): Radiotherapy planning and delivery guidance",
abstract = "Introduction Daily radiotherapy delivered with radiosensitisation offers patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) comparable outcomes to cystectomy with functional organ preservation. Most recurrences following radiotherapy occur within the bladder. Increasing the delivered radiotherapy dose to the tumour may further improve local control. Developments in image-guided radiotherapy have allowed bladder tumour-focused plan of the day' radiotherapy delivery. We aim to test within a randomised multicentre phase II trial whether this technique will enable dose escalation with acceptable rates of toxicity. Methods and analysis Patients with T2-T4aN0M0 unifocal MIBC will be randomised (1:1:2) between standard/control whole bladder single plan radiotherapy, standard dose adaptive tumour-focused radiotherapy or dose-escalated adaptive tumour-focused radiotherapy (DART). Adaptive tumour-focused radiotherapy will use a library of three plans (small, medium and large) for treatment. A cone beam CT taken prior to each treatment will be used to visualise the anatomy and inform selection of the most appropriate plan for treatment. Two radiotherapy fractionation schedules (32f and 20f) are permitted. A minimum of 120 participants will be randomised in each fractionation cohort (to ensure 57 evaluable DART patients per cohort). A comprehensive radiotherapy quality assurance programme including pretrial and on-trial components is instituted to ensure standardisation of radiotherapy planning and delivery. The trial has a two-stage non-comparative design. The primary end point of stage I is the proportion of patients meeting predefined normal tissue constraints in the DART group. The primary end point of stage II is late Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or worse toxicity aiming to exclude a rate of >20% (80% power and 5% alpha, one sided) in each DART fractionation cohort. Secondary end points include locoregional MIBC control, progression-free survival overall survival and patient-reported outcomes. Ethics and dissemination This clinical trial is approved by the London-Surrey Borders Research Ethics Committee (15/LO/0539). The results when available will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations and submission to regulatory authorities. Trial registration number NCT02447549; Pre-results ",
keywords = "clinical trials, oncology, radiotherapy, urological tumours",
author = "Shaista Hafeez and Amanda Webster and Hansen, {Vibeke N.} and McNair, {Helen A.} and Karole Warren-Oseni and Emma Patel and Ananya Choudhury and Joanne Creswell and Farshad Foroudi and Ann Henry and Tomas Kron and McLaren, {Duncan B.} and Mitra, {Anita V.} and Hugh Mostafid and Daniel Saunders and Elizabeth Miles and Clare Griffin and Rebecca Lewis and Emma Hall and Robert Huddart",
note = "Funding Information: SH, KW-O, HMcN, RL, EH and RH acknowledge this study represents independent research supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London. AC is supported by the NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre. The trial was supported by the National Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Team (RTTQA). Funding Information: The RAIDER trial is funded by Cancer Research UK (CRUK/14/016) with programme grants to support the work of the Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit at The Institute of Cancer Research (ICR-CTSU) (grant number C1491/A15955). Funding Information: SH reports non-financial support from Elekta (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden), non-financial support from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), personal fees and non-financial support from Roche outside the submitted work; AC reports grants from National Institute of Health Research Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, grants from Cancer Research, UK, grants from Medical Research Council, UK, grants from Prostate Cancer, UK, grants from Bayer, UK, personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceutical, non-financial support from ASCO, grants and non-financial support from Elekta AB, outside the submitted work; AH reports grants from CRUK, grants from MRC, grants from NIHR, outside the submitted work; TK reports reports grants from Cancer Australia, during the conduct of the study; and his group has a research collaborative agreement with Varian Medical System not related to this project; EH reports grants from Cancer Research UK during the conduct of the study; grants from Accuray Inc., grants from Varian Medical Systems Inc., outside the submitted work; RH reports non-financial support from Janssen, grants and personal fees from MSD, personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, grants from Cancer Research UK, other from Nektar Therapeutics, personal fees and non-financial support from Roche outside the submitted work. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Copyright: Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041005",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ ",
number = "12",
}