Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: A systematic review of its impact

Jose Valderas Martinez, Mireia Espallargues, Jose MARÍA Valderas, Jordi Alonso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. To assess the impact on the process and the outcomes of care of feeding back information on perceived health status to health care professionals in clinical practice. DESIGN. Systematic review of controlled trials. Data identification: Search in electronic databases (MEDLINE 1966-1997), manual searches, and requests to experts in the field. Data analysis: Differences between intervention and control group were considered in process of care (use of health services, diagnosis, and treatment), patient outcomes (health status), and patient satisfaction. In a subgroup of 13 interventions that dealt with the provision of feedback about the patient's mental health, the impact on the process of care was subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS. We identified 21 studies that satisfied the selection criteria. Eleven of 20 (55%) found significant differences (P
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-186
Number of pages11
JournalMedical care
Volume38
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2000

Keywords

  • Clinical practice
  • Health status indicators
  • Outcome assessment (health care)
  • Quality of life
  • Questionnaires
  • Review literature
  • Screening

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Provision of feedback on perceived health status to health care professionals: A systematic review of its impact'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this