Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)

D Gareth Evans, Lorna McWilliams, Susan Astley, Adam R Brentnall, Jack Cuzick, Richard Dobrashian, Stephen W Duffy, Louise S Gorman, Elaine F Harkness, Fiona Harrison, Michelle Harvie, Andrew Jerrison, Matthew Machin, Anthony J Maxwell, Sacha J Howell, Stuart J Wright, Katherine Payne, Nadeem Qureshi, Helen Ruane, Jake SouthworthLynne Fox, Sarah Bowers, Gillian Hutchinson, Emma Thorpe, Fiona Ulph, Victoria Woof, Anthony Howell, David P French

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification as a routine part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) could provide a better balance of benefits and harms. We developed BC-Predict, to offer women when invited to the NHSBSP, which collects standard risk factor information; mammographic density; and in a sub-sample, a Polygenic Risk Score (PRS).

METHODS: Risk prediction was estimated primarily from self-reported questionnaires and mammographic density using the Tyrer-Cuzick risk model. Women eligible for NHSBSP were recruited. BC-Predict produced risk feedback letters, inviting women at high risk (≥8% 10-year) or moderate risk (≥5-<8% 10-year) to have appointments to discuss prevention and additional screening.

RESULTS: Overall uptake of BC-Predict in screening attendees was 16.9% with 2472 consenting to the study; 76.8% of those received risk feedback within the 8-week timeframe. Recruitment was 63.2% with an onsite recruiter and paper questionnaire compared to <10% with BC-Predict only (P < 0.0001). Risk appointment attendance was highest for those at high risk (40.6%); 77.5% of those opted for preventive medication.

DISCUSSION: We have shown that a real-time offer of breast cancer risk information (including both mammographic density and PRS) is feasible and can be delivered in reasonable time, although uptake requires personal contact. Preventive medication uptake in women newly identified at high risk is high and could improve the cost-effectiveness of risk stratification.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04359420).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2063-2071
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume128
Issue number11
Early online date1 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2023

Keywords

  • screening
  • breast cancer
  • risk stratification
  • high risk
  • psychological impact
  • early detection
  • mammographic density
  • breast cancer preventive medication (BCPM)
  • Tyrer-Cuzick
  • anxiety

Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this