Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)

  • Queen Mary University of London
  • Royal Blackburn Hospital
  • Patient representative
  • University of Maryland at College Park
  • Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Risk stratification as a routine part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) could provide a better balance of benefits and harms. We developed BC-Predict, to offer women when invited to the NHSBSP, which collects standard risk factor information; mammographic density; and in a sub-sample, a Polygenic Risk Score (PRS). Methods: Risk prediction was estimated primarily from self-reported questionnaires and mammographic density using the Tyrer–Cuzick risk model. Women eligible for NHSBSP were recruited. BC-Predict produced risk feedback letters, inviting women at high risk (≥8% 10-year) or moderate risk (≥5–<8% 10-year) to have appointments to discuss prevention and additional screening. Results: Overall uptake of BC-Predict in screening attendees was 16.9% with 2472 consenting to the study; 76.8% of those received risk feedback within the 8-week timeframe. Recruitment was 63.2% with an onsite recruiter and paper questionnaire compared to <10% with BC-Predict only (P < 0.0001). Risk appointment attendance was highest for those at high risk (40.6%); 77.5% of those opted for preventive medication. Discussion: We have shown that a real-time offer of breast cancer risk information (including both mammographic density and PRS) is feasible and can be delivered in reasonable time, although uptake requires personal contact. Preventive medication uptake in women newly identified at high risk is high and could improve the cost-effectiveness of risk stratification. Trial registration: Retrospectively registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04359420).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2063-2071
Number of pages9
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume128
Issue number11
Early online date1 Apr 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • screening
  • breast cancer
  • risk stratification
  • high risk
  • psychological impact
  • early detection
  • mammographic density
  • breast cancer preventive medication (BCPM)
  • Tyrer-Cuzick
  • anxiety

Research Highlights, Institutes and Platforms

  • Manchester Cancer Research Centre

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quantifying the effects of risk-stratified breast cancer screening when delivered in real time as routine practice versus usual screening: the BC-Predict non-randomised controlled study (NCT04359420)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this