Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics studies on the sulfoxidation of dimethyl sulfide by compound i and compound 0 of cytochrome p450: Which is the better oxidant

Cristina S. Porro, Michael J. Sutcliffe, Sam P. De Visser

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The cytochromes P450 are ubiquitous enzymes that are involved in key metabolizing processes in the body through the monoxygenation of substrates; however, their active oxidant is elusive. There have been reports that implicate that two oxidants, namely, the iron(IV)-oxo porphyrin cation radical (compound I) and the iron(in)-hydroperoxo complex (compound 0), both act as oxidants of sulfoxidation reactions, which contrasts theoretical studies on alkene epoxidation by compounds I and 0 that implicated compound 0 as a sluggish oxidant. To resolve this controversy and to establish the potency of compound I and compound 0 in sulfoxidation reactions, we have studied dimethyl sulfide sulfoxidation by both oxidants using the quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) technique on cytochrome P450 enzymes and have set up a model of two P450 isozymes: P450cam and P450BM.V The calculations support earlier gas-phase density functional theory modeling and show that compound 0 is a sluggish oxidant that is unable to compete with compound I. Furthermore, compound I is shown to react with dimethyl sulfide via single-state reactivity on a dominant quartet spin state surface. © 2009 American Chemical Society.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)11635-11642
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Physical Chemistry A
    Volume113
    Issue number43
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 29 Oct 2009

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics studies on the sulfoxidation of dimethyl sulfide by compound i and compound 0 of cytochrome p450: Which is the better oxidant'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this