Abstract
The main goal of this paper is to work out Quine’s account of explication. Quine does not provide a general account, but considers a paradigmatic example which does not fit other examples he claims to be explications. Besides working out Quine’s account of explication and explaining this tension, I show how it connects to other notions such as paraphrase and ontological commitment. Furthermore, I relate Quinean explication to Carnap’s conception and argue that Quinean explication is much narrower because its main purpose is to be a criterion of theory choice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 30 |
Journal | Inquiry |
Early online date | 2 Nov 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 8 Nov 2021 |
Keywords
- Carnap
- Quine
- explication
- paraphrase