Abstract
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2353-2366 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | The Lancet |
Volume | 392 |
Issue number | 10162 |
Early online date | 21 Oct 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 21 Oct 2018 |
Keywords
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
- Disease-Free Survival
- Docetaxel/therapeutic use
- Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists
- Humans
- Lymph Nodes/pathology
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neoplasm Metastasis
- Orchiectomy
- Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy
- Radiotherapy/adverse effects
- Standard of Care
- Survival Analysis
- Treatment Outcome
Research Beacons, Institutes and Platforms
- Manchester Cancer Research Centre
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Impacts
-
Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial
(Corresponding participant)
Impact: Health and wellbeing
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver
}
In: The Lancet, Vol. 392, No. 10162, 21.10.2018, p. 2353-2366.
Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial
AU - Parker, Christopher C
AU - James, Nicholas D
AU - Brawley, Christopher D
AU - Clarke, Noel W
AU - Hoyle, Alex P
AU - Ali, Adnan
AU - Ritchie, Alastair W S
AU - Attard, Gerhardt
AU - Chowdhury, Simon
AU - Cross, William
AU - Dearnaley, David P
AU - Gillessen, Silke
AU - Gilson, Clare
AU - Jones, Robert J
AU - Langley, Ruth E
AU - Malik, Zafar I
AU - Mason, Malcolm D
AU - Matheson, David
AU - Millman, Robin
AU - Russell, J Martin
AU - Thalmann, George N
AU - Amos, Claire L
AU - Alonzi, Roberto
AU - Bahl, Amit
AU - Birtle, Alison
AU - Din, Omar
AU - Douis, Hassan
AU - Eswar, Chinnamani
AU - Gale, Joanna
AU - Gannon, Melissa R
AU - Jonnada, Sai
AU - Khaksar, Sara
AU - Lester, Jason F
AU - O'sullivan, Joe M
AU - Parikh, Omi A
AU - Pedley, Ian D
AU - Pudney, Delia M
AU - Sheehan, Denise J
AU - Srihari, Narayanan Nair
AU - Tran, Anna T H
AU - Parmar, Mahesh K B
AU - Sydes, Matthew R
N1 - Funding Information: This randomised comparison of more than 2000 patients with metastatic prostate cancer showed that local radiotherapy to the prostate did not improve overall survival for unselected patients. However, a prespecified analysis showed that prostate radiotherapy did improve overall survival (from 73% to 81% at 3 years) in those with a low metastatic burden, which represented 40% of the comparison population. Our subgroup finding meets all criteria proposed by Sun and colleagues to assess credibility of subgroup effects: 20 low metastatic burden status was determined from scans taken before randomisation; the hypothesis—including the direction of the effect—was specified a priori; only a few hypothesised subgroup effects were tested; the interaction test suggested a low likelihood that the apparent subgroup effect could be accounted for by chance; the subgroup effect was independent of other assessed variables; the size of the subgroup effect was large (HR 0·68 for low metastatic burden and HR 1·07 high metastatic burden); and the interaction was consistent both with other related outcome measures in STAMPEDE (eg, failure-free survival) and with the interaction reported on number of bone metastases in the HORRAD trial 12 (less than five bone metastases, HR 0·68; five or more bone metastases, HR 1·06). It also seems plausible that the effect of local radiotherapy would be diminished in patients with a greater burden of metastatic disease. There is, therefore, good reason to accept that prostate radiotherapy improves survival of men with a low metastatic burden and that it should now be a standard treatment. Unlike many other new interventions for metastatic cancer, prostate radiotherapy does not require regulatory approval and is readily available at modest cost in most parts of the world. When this comparison was designed, the standard radical radiotherapy dose schedule for localised prostate cancer was 74 Gy in 37 fractions over 7·5 weeks. It was felt that this schedule would be too burdensome for patients with metastatic disease, and the two more convenient schedules permitted in the trial were chosen based on a survey of investigators' opinions. The trial has proven the principle that local radiotherapy can improve survival, but the optimum dose schedule and technique are uncertain. Radical radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer is now typically given to a dose of 60 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks. 21 With contemporary techniques for target delineation and treatment delivery, this schedule is well tolerated 21 and might be expected to be at least as effective as the two schedules tested in the trial. It is well known that prostate radiotherapy improves survival for men with locally advanced (T3–4 N0 M0) prostate cancer. 22 We have now found that prostate radiotherapy also improves survival for men with a low metastatic burden (T any N any M1) prostate cancer. It therefore seems safe to conclude that radiotherapy would also improve survival for men with pelvic node-positive prostate cancer (T any N1 M0). This is important, because it is not feasible to do randomised trials specifically in men with non-metastatic node-positive prostate cancer and because such men often receive systemic treatment alone. In the current study, roughly 60% of patients were N1 in both the high and low metastatic burden subgroups. The benefit we have shown for prostate radiotherapy in prostate cancer with a low metastatic burden also raises another question: would there be further benefit from additional radiotherapy to the oligometastases themselves? Low metastatic burden disease is sometimes known as oligometastatic. Although this term is widely used, it is imprecise and potentially misleading because it implies only a small number of metastases. Patients with low metastatic burden disease, according to the CHAARTED definition, may have an unlimited number of metastases provided they are confined to lymph nodes and the axial skeleton. Our data have several strengths to note. This is a large randomised dataset with broad engagement from more than 100 hospitals across Switzerland and the UK. By incorporating the comparison into the established STAMPEDE protocol, following peer-review and protocol amendment, we recruited to an enlarged target well ahead of schedule (2061 patients in 3·5 years rather than 1250 patients in 4 years). Our data also have some limitations. First, the possible clinical relevance of metastatic burden in patients with prostate cancer only became widely apparent when the CHAARTED trial reported. 15 We determined metastatic burden by retrospectively collecting retrievable baseline scans. This was possible in most (94%) but not all patients. Second, compliance with allocation to prostate radiotherapy was not complete (94%) and this could underestimate the true effect size for radiotherapy. Third, median follow-up (37 months) is shorter than median survival (46 months); this could be particularly relevant to the analysis of symptomatic local events, which can occur late and after disease progression. We plan to continue follow-up and to link to routinely collected electronic health records to capture symptomatic local events. Our current analysis indicates that radiotherapy does not improve survival for patients with a high metastatic burden. Future analyses will explore whether prostate radiotherapy might still be useful in such patients for prevention of symptomatic local events. Fourth, up-front systemic treatment of metastatic prostate cancer has evolved. Most patients in this comparison received androgen deprivation alone. Docetaxel was permitted in addition to hormone therapy after its approval in the UK 15,23,24 and was used, therefore, mostly in recently randomised patients who had the shortest follow-up. Although only roughly one in six patients received docetaxel in this comparison, there is no evidence to suggest that prostate radiotherapy is more or less effective when docetaxel is given in addition to androgen deprivation therapy. More recently, abiraterone has become another option in this setting. 25–28 The value of prostate radiotherapy in men receiving abiraterone is being tested in the PEACE1 trial ( NCT01957436 ), 29 and the prospectively planned STOPCAP M1 meta-analysis of these trials will explore this further. 30 We have tested local treatment to the prostate using radiotherapy. It is possible that other forms of local treatment—such as radical prostatectomy—might also be effective. If the benefit of radiotherapy is mediated by local tumour eradication, one would expect surgery to be at least as effective. However, radiotherapy might be effective via other mechanisms (eg, immune modulation), so the role of surgery in men with metastatic prostate cancer remains unproven. The feasibility of prostate surgery in this setting is being tested in the g-RAMMP trial ( NCT02454543 ) and the TROMBONE feasibility study. 31 There is uncertainty regarding the optimum definition of low metastatic burden (oligometastatic) prostate cancer. We used the same definition as that in the CHAARTED trial, but this is not necessarily the optimum definition. Our findings were almost identical when applying a variant of the definition used in the LATITUDE trial; 25 absence of visceral metastases and fewer than three bone metastases (data not shown). Exploratory analyses of a broader cohort of patients in the STAMPEDE study will inform the definition of oligometastatic disease, with the aim of refining patients' selection for prostate radiotherapy. All current definitions are based on conventional imaging using CT and bone scans. Caution will be required in extrapolating these results to patients imaged with more sensitive techniques (eg, PSMA PET). For example, patients with low metastatic burden on conventional imaging should not be denied prostate radiotherapy because they have additional lesions identified on a PET scan. In summary, radiotherapy to the prostate did not improve survival for unselected patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer, but, in a prespecified subgroup analysis, overall survival did improve in men with a low metastatic burden. Therefore, prostate radiotherapy should be a standard treatment option for men with a low metastatic burden. These findings also raise the possibility that local treatment to the primary tumour should be explored for patients with small-volume metastatic disease from other malignant diseases. Contributors CCP was comparison chief investigator. NDJ was protocol chief investigator. CCP, MRS, NDJ, MDM, DPD, NWC, and MKBP contributed to comparison design. CLA contributed to trial operations. APH, AA, and NWC collated and reviewed bone and CT scans. HD reviewed bone and CT scans. MRS, CDB, CCP, MRG, NWC, MKBP, NDJ, APH, and AA contributed to the analysis plan. CDB, MRS, APH, and AA did analyses. CCP, CDB, MRS, NDJ, MKBP, NWC, APH, and AA contributed to writing of the report. The Trial Management Group consisted of NDJ (chair), MDM, and NWC (vice chairs), and MKBP, MRS, DPD, NWC, AWSR, REL, GNT, WC, SG, ZIM, SC, CCP, GA, DM, JMR, and RJJ. All authors collated and interpreted data, and edited, reviewed, and approved the final report. Systemic Therapy for Advanced or Metastatic Prostate cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy (STAMPEDE) investigators Independent Oversight Committee Members : Independent Data Monitoring Committee —John Yarnold (chair), Ronald de Wit, Bertrand Tombal (previous: Doug Altman, Reg Hall, Chris Williams); Independent members of Trial Steering Committee : Jonathan Ledermann (chair), Jan Erik Damber, Richard Emsley, Alan Horwich (previous: John Fitzpatrick, David Kirk, Jim Paul). Participating Site List (hospital [n patients during recruitment window: recruiting investigators]) —Addenbrooke's Hospital (7: D Mazhar); Ashford William Harvey Hospital (10: C Thomas, N Mithal, A Edwards); Aylesbury, Stoke Mandeville Hospital (4: T Pwint, P Camilleri); Ayr Hospital (15: H Glen, J Ansari); Barnet General Hospital (15: U McGovern, A Eichholz); Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital (7: R Shaffer); Bath, Royal United Hospital (34: O Frim, M Beresford, P Kehagioglou); Belfast City Hospital (64: J O'Sullivan, D Mitchell, S Jain, P L Shum); Birmingham, City Hospital (14: D Ford); Birmingham, Good Hope Hospital (10: D Ford); Birmingham, Heartlands Hospital (11: A Zarkar); Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth (36: N James); Blackburn, East Lancashire Trust (52: O Parikh, N Charnley); Bolton, Royal Bolton Hospital (11: T Elliott); Boston, Pilgrim Hospital (18: M Panades, D Ballesteros-Quintail); Bournemouth, Royal Bournemouth Hospital (23: S Brock); Bradford Royal Infirmary (20: S Brown); Brighton, Royal Sussex County Hospital (17: A Robinson, G Plantaniotis); Bristol Haematology & Oncology Centre (58: A Bahl, C Herbert, S Masson); Burton, Queen's Hospital (40: M Smith-Howell, S Chetiyawardana, P Pattu); Bury St Edmunds, West Suffolk Hospital (14: C Woodward, Y Rimmer); Cardiff, Velindre (86: J Lester, J Staffurth, J Barber, S Kumar, N Palaniappan, M Button, J Tanguay); Chelmsford, Broomfield Hospital (24: A Hamid); Cheltenham General Hospital (33: J Bowen, S Jonnada, P Jenkins); Chester, Countess of Chester Hospital (26: A Ibrahim); Coventry & Warwickshire, University Hospital (26: J Worlding, A Stockdale); Crewe, Leighton Hospital (22: J Wylie); Cumbria, Cumberland Infirmary (8: A Kumar); Darlington Memorial Hospital (26: M Kagzi, J Hardman, C Peedell); Derby, Royal Derby Hospital (43: P Chakraborti); Devon, North Devon District Hospital (16: D Sheehan, P Stephens); Doncaster Royal Infirmary (25: V Sivoglo, C Ferguson, M Alzouebi); Dorset County Hospital (2: P Crellin); Dudley, Russells Hall Hospital (20: P Keng-Koh, S Tirmazy); Eastbourne District General Hospital (12: F McKinna); Edinburgh, Western General (40: D McLaren); Essex County Hospital (31: D Muthukumar, B Sizer, M Kumar); Exeter, Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Foundation Trust (59: D Sheehan, R Srinivasan, V Ford); Gillingham, Medway Hospital (19: H Taylor); Glangwili General Hospital (2: M D Phan); Glasgow, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre (64: B Venugopal; J Wallace, R Jones, C Lamb); Guildford, Royal Surrey County Hospital (45: R Laing, S Khaksar, K Wood, J Money-Kyrle); Harlow, Princess Alexandra Hospital (16: N Gupta, L Melcher); Hereford County Hospital (22: W Grant, A Cook); Huddersfield Royal Infirmary (32: U Hofmann); Hull, Castle Hill Hospital (33: M Simms, J Hetherington); Inverness, Raigmore Hospital (26: N McPhail, C MacGregor); Ipswich Hospital (36: R Venkitaraman, C Scrase); Keighley, Airedale Hospital (24: S Brown); Kent and Canterbury Hospital (24: C Thomas, R Raman, N Mithal); Kent, Queen Elizabeth Queen Mother Hospital (14: R Raman); Kidderminster General Hospital (13: L Capaldi, M Churn); Larbert, Forth Valley Royal Hospital (16: N Sidek); Leeds, St James University Hospital (55: W Cross, C Loughrey, S Jagdev, A Henry, D Bottomley, S Prescott, A Paul); Lincoln County Hospital (25: T Sreenivasan, D Ballesteros-Quintail, M Panades); Liverpool, Royal Liverpool University Hospital (30: Z Malik, C Eswar); Liverpool, University Hospital Aintree (7: P Robson); London, Charing Cross Hospital (27: A Falconer, S Mangar); London, Guy's Hospital (47: S Chowdhury, S Morris); London, North Middlesex Hospital (11: J Newby, A Thompson, L Melcher, M Singhera); London, Royal Free Hospital (10: M Vilarino-Varela, K Pigott, N Rosenfelder); London, St Bartholomew's Hospital (7: P Wells, K Tipples); London, St George's Hospital (21: L Pickering); London, University College Hospital (14: U McGovern, H Payne); Maidstone, Kent Oncology Centre (40: H Taylor, K Lees, A Clarke, S Beesley); Manchester Christie Hospital (51: N Clarke, T Elliott, J Livsey, J Wylie, R Conroy, A Choudhury, A Tran, J Logue); Manchester, Royal Oldham Hospital (22: J Livsey, A Choudhury); Manchester, Salford Royal Hospital (18: N Clarke, T Elliot); Middlesbrough, James Cook University Hospital (28: C Peedell, H Van der Voet, J Hardman); Newcastle, Freeman Hospital (63: A Azzabi, R McMenemin, J Frew); North Staffordshire University Hospital (21: F Adab, S Vengalil, R Bhana); Northwood, Mount Vernon Hospital (58: P Hoskin, P Ostler, R Alonzi, C Westbury, R Hughes, N Anyamene); Nottingham University Hospitals, City Campus (32: S Sundar, J Mills, G Walker, E Chadwick); Nuneaton, George Eliot Hospital (4: A Chan); Oxford, Churchill Hospital (35: A Protheroe, D Cole, A Sabharwal, M Tuthill); Poole Hospital (24: J Davies); Portsmouth, Queen Alexandra Hospital (81: J Gale); Preston, Royal Preston Hospital (54: A Birtle, O Parikh, M Wise, N Charnley); Reading, Royal Berkshire Hospital (10: P Rogers, H O'Donnell); Redditch, Alexandra Hospital (12: B Kurec, J Hamilton); Romford, Queen's Hospital (30: S Gibbs, K Tarver); Royal Hampshire Hospital (2: S Paisey); Scarborough General Hospital (29: M Hingorani); Sheffield, Weston Park (55: C Ferguson, O Din, M Alzouebi, L Evans, T Das); Shrewsbury, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital (50: N Srihari, R Prashant); Somerset, Weston General Hospital (7: S Hilman); Southampton General Hospital (28: C Heath, M Wheater, S Crabb); Southend University Hospital (28: D Tsang, I Ahmed, O Chan); Southport and Formby District General Hospital (10: N Bhalla); St Leonards-on-Sea, Conquest Hospital (4: F McKinna, K Lees); Stevenage, Lister Hospital (10: R Hughes); Stockport, Stepping Hill Hospital (39: J Logue, C Coyle); Stockton-on-Tees, University Hospital North Tees (21: D Leaning, D Shakespeare); Sunderland Royal Hospital (10: A Azzabi, I Pedley, S Iqbal); Sutton-in-Ashford, King's Mill Hospital (26: D Saunders, G Walker); Sutton, Royal Marsden Hospital (58: D Dearnaley, N Van As, C Parker, V Khoo); Swansea, Singleton (53: D Pudney, J Wagstaff, M D Phan); Swindon, Great Western Hospital (23: O Khan, D Cole); Taunton, Musgrove Park Hospital (33: E Gray, J Graham, M Varughese); Torbay District General Hospital (32: A Lydon, R Srinivasan); Tyne and Wear, South Tyneside District Hospital (2: A Azzabi); Warrington Hospital (35: I Syndikus, S Tolan); Warwick Hospital (11: A Stockdale); Wigan, Royal Albert Edward Infirmary (10: A Tran); Bebington (Wirral), Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology (36: S Tolan, I Syndikus, N Bhalla, A Ibrahim, A Montazeri, J Littler); Wolverhampton, New Cross Hospital (31: S Tirmazy, I Sayers); Woolwich, Queen Elizabeth Hospital (5: S Hughes); Worcestershire Royal Hospital (18: L Capaldi, J Bowen); Worthing Hospital (21: A Nikapota, G Plataniotis); Wycombe Hospital (19: P Camilleri, A Sabharwal, T Pwint, G Andrade); Yeovil District Hospital (3: E Gray, G Sparrow); York Teaching Hospital (8: J Joseph, D Bottomley); Basel Universitatsspital (3: C Rentsch); Berne University Hospital [Inselspital] (4: G Thalmann); Chur Kantonsspital Graubunden (13: R Strebel, R Cathomas); Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana (2: E Roggero); Kantonsspital St Gallen (5: D Engeler); Lausanne, Centre Hospital University Vaudois (3: D Berthold); and more than 3000 local site team staff across these hospitals. Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London— Statisticians: Matthew Sydes, Max Parmar, Chris Brawley, Fiona Ingleby, Adrian Cook (previous: Gordana Jovic, Patrick Royston, Babak Choodari-Oskooei, Daniel Bratton, Andrew Embleton, Melissa Gannon [nee Spears]); Project and Trial Managers: Claire Amos, Nafisah Atako, Cheryl Pugh, Claire Murphy, Joanna Calvert, Mazna Anjum, Chris Wanstall, Arlen Wilcox, Charlotte Tyson, Michelle Buckner, Dymphna Lee (previous: Charlene Green, Francesca Schiavone, Katie Ward, Anna Herasimtschuk, Jenny Petrie, Alanna Brown, Orla Prendiville, Shabinah Ali); Data Managers: Carly Au, Lina Bergstrom, Tasmin Philips, Steph Wetton, Saba Khan, Amy Fiddament, Georgia Mannion-Krase, Hannah Sweeney (previous: Charlene Green, Elizabeth Clark, Sara Peres, Hannah Gardner, Dominic Hague, Katie Ward, Peter Vaughan, Eva Ades, Hannah Babiker, Zohrah Khan, Nargis Begum, Saba Khan, Jenna Grabey, Danielle Johnson); Data Scientists and Programmers: Nadine Van Looy, Zaheer Islam, Dominic Hague, Carly Au (previous: Lindsey Masters, Will Cragg, Sajad Khan); Clinicians: Clare Gilson, Alastair Ritchie; Trial Assistants: Stephanie Wetton, Amy Fiddament (previous: Leigh Dobson, Alexandra Wadia, Nat Thorogood, Shanaz, Sohail, Tracey Fisher, Andrew Whitney, Elizabeth Adesanya). Swiss Group for Cancer Clinical Research— Project and Trial Managers: Eloïse Kremer, Corinne Schar (previous: Estelle Cassolly). Declaration of interests GA reports personal fees from Veridex, Novartis, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, and Sanofi-Aventis, outside the submitted work; personal fees and non-financial support from Roche/Ventana, Astellas, Medivation, Pfizer, Abbott Laboratories, Essa Pharmaceuticals, and Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work; grants from AstraZeneca, Arno Therapeutics, and Innocrin Pharma, outside the submitted work; grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Janssen, outside the submitted work; and personal fees and other from the Institute of Cancer Research, outside the submitted work. ABi reports advisory board fees from Astellas, during the conduct of the study; personal fees, speaker fees, and advisory board fees from Sanofi, during the conduct of the study; personal fees and advisory board fees from Janssen, during the conduct of the study; and advisory board fees from Bayer and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. SC reports personal fees from Janssen Pharmaceutical, outside the submitted work. NWC reports personal fees from Janssen, during the conduct of the study and outside the submitted work. WC reports personal fees from Janssen, outside the submitted work; and advisory board fees from Bayer, outside the submitted work. DPD reports grants and other from the National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research, during the conduct of the study; grants from Cancer Research UK (programme grant C46/A10588, C33589/A19727) , during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Amgen, Astellas, Takeda, Sandoz, Janssen, and the Institute of Cancer Research (share of royalties for abiraterone), outside the submitted work; and has a patent (EP1933709B1) issued. SG reports personal fees and honoraria to her hospital from AAA International, Roche, Orion, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work; honoraria to her hospital from Bayer, Clovis, CureVac, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Ferring, Innocrin Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, and Cell Search, outside the submitted work; uncompensated advisory role for Nectar Therapeutics and ProteoMediX, outside the submitted work; and personal fees from MaxiVax SA, outside the submitted work. CG reports grants from Clovis Oncology, outside the submitted work. NDJ reports advisory board fees from Sanofi and Novartis, outside the submitted work; and grants, personal fees, non-financial support, advisory board fees, speaker fees, and travel fees from Janssen, outside the submitted work. RJJ reports personal fees and non-financial support from Janssen, outside the submitted work; grants, personal fees, research funding, honoraria, speaker fees, and advisory board fees from Astellas, outside the submitted work; and personal fees and advisory board fees from Sanofi and Novartis, outside the submitted work. JFL reports personal fees, non-financial support, advisory board fees, and travel fees from Janssen, Astellas, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. ZIM reports personal fees, consultancy, advisory board fees, honoraria, and travel fees from Janssen and Sanofi, outside the submitted work; advisory board fees, honoraria, and travel fees from Astellas, outside the submitted work; and travel fees from Bayer, outside the submitted work. MDM reports personal fees, speaker fees, and advisory board fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work; and personal fees from Janssen and Bayer, outside the submitted work. JMO'S reports advisory board fees from Sanofi, outside the submitted work; personal fees, speaker fees, and advisory board fees from Janssen and Astellas, outside the submitted work; and speaker fees, advisory board fees, and research funding from Bayer, outside the submitted work. CCP reports a research grant, personal fees, and advisory board fees from Bayer, outside the submitted work; advisory board fees from AAA, outside the submitted work; and personal fees and speaker fees from Janssen, outside the submitted work. MKBP reports educational grants from Astellas, Clovis Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. DJS reports fees for meeting attendance from Astellas and Ipsen, outside the submitted work. NNS reports personal fees from Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Roche, outside the submitted work. MRS reports grants and non-financial support from Astellas, Clovis Oncology, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work; personal fees from Eli Lilly, outside the submitted work; and grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Janssen, outside the submitted work. AA, RA, CLA, ABa, CDB, OD, HD, CE, JG, MRG, APH, SJ, SK, REL, DM, RM, OAP, IDP, DMP, AWSR, GNT, ATHT, and JMR declare no competing interests. Acknowledgments This trial was funded by Cancer Research UK (CRUK_A12459), UK Medical Research Council (MRC_MC_UU_12023/25), and the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research. Research support for the protocol was provided by Cancer Research UK (CRUK_A12459), UK Medical Research Council (MRC_MC_UU_12023/25), the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Astellas, Clovis Oncology, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and Sanofi-Aventis. This Article represents independent research part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre at the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and the Institute of Cancer Research. The views expressed in this Article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the NIHR, or the Department of Health. We thank Fiona Ingleby and Adrian Cook (Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit at University College London) for reviewing analyses. Publisher Copyright: © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license Copyright: Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2018/10/21
Y1 - 2018/10/21
N2 - Background Based on previous findings, we hypothesised that radiotherapy to the prostate would improve overall survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer, and that the benefit would be greatest in patients with a low metastatic burden. We aimed to compare standard of care for metastatic prostate cancer, with and without radiotherapy. Methods We did a randomised controlled phase 3 trial at 117 hospitals in Switzerland and the UK. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. We randomly allocated patients open-label in a 1:1 ratio to standard of care (control group) or standard of care and radiotherapy (radiotherapy group). Randomisation was stratified by hospital, age at randomisation, nodal involvement, WHO performance status, planned androgen deprivation therapy, planned docetaxel use (from December, 2015), and regular aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Standard of care was lifelong androgen deprivation therapy, with up-front docetaxel permitted from December, 2015. Men allocated radiotherapy received either a daily (55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks) or weekly (36 Gy in six fractions over 6 weeks) schedule that was nominated before randomisation. The primary outcome was overall survival, measured as the number of deaths; this analysis had 90% power with a one-sided α of 2·5% for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·75. Secondary outcomes were failure-free survival, progression-free survival, metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, and symptomatic local event-free survival. Analyses used Cox proportional hazards and flexible parametric models, adjusted for stratification factors. The primary outcome analysis was by intention to treat. Two prespecified subgroup analyses tested the effects of prostate radiotherapy by baseline metastatic burden and radiotherapy schedule. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00268476. Findings Between Jan 22, 2013, and Sept 2, 2016, 2061 men underwent randomisation, 1029 were allocated the control and 1032 radiotherapy. Allocated groups were balanced, with a median age of 68 years (IQR 63–73) and median amount of prostate-specific antigen of 97 ng/mL (33–315). 367 (18%) patients received early docetaxel. 1082 (52%) participants nominated the daily radiotherapy schedule before randomisation and 979 (48%) the weekly schedule. 819 (40%) men had a low metastatic burden, 1120 (54%) had a high metastatic burden, and the metastatic burden was unknown for 122 (6%). Radiotherapy improved failure-free survival (HR 0·76, 95% CI 0·68–0·84; p<0·0001) but not overall survival (0·92, 0·80–1·06; p=0·266). Radiotherapy was well tolerated, with 48 (5%) adverse events (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3–4) reported during radiotherapy and 37 (4%) after radiotherapy. The proportion reporting at least one severe adverse event (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or worse) was similar by treatment group in the safety population (398 [38%] with control and 380 [39%] with radiotherapy). Interpretation Radiotherapy to the prostate did not improve overall survival for unselected patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.
AB - Background Based on previous findings, we hypothesised that radiotherapy to the prostate would improve overall survival in men with metastatic prostate cancer, and that the benefit would be greatest in patients with a low metastatic burden. We aimed to compare standard of care for metastatic prostate cancer, with and without radiotherapy. Methods We did a randomised controlled phase 3 trial at 117 hospitals in Switzerland and the UK. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. We randomly allocated patients open-label in a 1:1 ratio to standard of care (control group) or standard of care and radiotherapy (radiotherapy group). Randomisation was stratified by hospital, age at randomisation, nodal involvement, WHO performance status, planned androgen deprivation therapy, planned docetaxel use (from December, 2015), and regular aspirin or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Standard of care was lifelong androgen deprivation therapy, with up-front docetaxel permitted from December, 2015. Men allocated radiotherapy received either a daily (55 Gy in 20 fractions over 4 weeks) or weekly (36 Gy in six fractions over 6 weeks) schedule that was nominated before randomisation. The primary outcome was overall survival, measured as the number of deaths; this analysis had 90% power with a one-sided α of 2·5% for a hazard ratio (HR) of 0·75. Secondary outcomes were failure-free survival, progression-free survival, metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, and symptomatic local event-free survival. Analyses used Cox proportional hazards and flexible parametric models, adjusted for stratification factors. The primary outcome analysis was by intention to treat. Two prespecified subgroup analyses tested the effects of prostate radiotherapy by baseline metastatic burden and radiotherapy schedule. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00268476. Findings Between Jan 22, 2013, and Sept 2, 2016, 2061 men underwent randomisation, 1029 were allocated the control and 1032 radiotherapy. Allocated groups were balanced, with a median age of 68 years (IQR 63–73) and median amount of prostate-specific antigen of 97 ng/mL (33–315). 367 (18%) patients received early docetaxel. 1082 (52%) participants nominated the daily radiotherapy schedule before randomisation and 979 (48%) the weekly schedule. 819 (40%) men had a low metastatic burden, 1120 (54%) had a high metastatic burden, and the metastatic burden was unknown for 122 (6%). Radiotherapy improved failure-free survival (HR 0·76, 95% CI 0·68–0·84; p<0·0001) but not overall survival (0·92, 0·80–1·06; p=0·266). Radiotherapy was well tolerated, with 48 (5%) adverse events (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade 3–4) reported during radiotherapy and 37 (4%) after radiotherapy. The proportion reporting at least one severe adverse event (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or worse) was similar by treatment group in the safety population (398 [38%] with control and 380 [39%] with radiotherapy). Interpretation Radiotherapy to the prostate did not improve overall survival for unselected patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.
KW - Aged
KW - Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use
KW - Disease-Free Survival
KW - Docetaxel/therapeutic use
KW - Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists
KW - Humans
KW - Lymph Nodes/pathology
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Neoplasm Metastasis
KW - Orchiectomy
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/drug therapy
KW - Radiotherapy/adverse effects
KW - Standard of Care
KW - Survival Analysis
KW - Treatment Outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058150016&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32486-3
DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32486-3
M3 - Article
C2 - 30355464
SN - 0140-6736
VL - 392
SP - 2353
EP - 2366
JO - The Lancet
JF - The Lancet
IS - 10162
ER -