Randomized study of adjusted versus fixed low dose heparin prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis in hip surgery

D. A. Taberner, L. Poller, J. M. Thomson, G. Lemon, F. J. Weighill

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    A randomized study of adjusted versus fixed low dose heparin prophylaxis has been conducted in 100 patients undergoing surgery for hip replacement or fractured neck of femur. The two types of patients were randomized independently into the adjusted and fixed dose regimens. Patients in the adjusted group were controlled by an activated partial thromboplastin time method particularly responsive to the anticoagulant effect of heparin. The aim was to maintain the peak value just above the upper limit of the normal range. Adjustment of dosage began 24 h after surgery in the replacement group and 24 h after admission in the fracture group. Significant improvement in protection against postoperative deep vein thrombosis, assessed by venography, was observed in the adjusted group undergoing hip replacement (P = 0.013) and overall in both groups (P = 0.017) compared with a conventional fixed dose subcutaneous regimen (calcium heparin 5000 units, 8-hourly). In most instances, adjustment resulted in increased heparin dosage but this was not associated with any evidence of excessive bleeding.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)933-935
    Number of pages2
    JournalBritish Journal of Surgery
    Volume76
    Issue number9
    Publication statusPublished - 1989

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Randomized study of adjusted versus fixed low dose heparin prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis in hip surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this