Ranked importance of outcomes of first-line versus repeated chemotherapy among ovarian cancer patients

Vanessa L. Beesley, Alexandra M. Clavarino, Penelope M. Webb, David K. Wyld, Alessandra B. Francesconi, Keith R. Horwood, James D. Doecke, Colleen A. Loos, Adele C. Green

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: To examine the importance of possible outcomes of first-line versus repeated chemotherapy to ovarian cancer patients and to compare doctors' treatment intentions with patients' beliefs about cure. Methods: Women with newly diagnosed (74) or relapsed (48) ovarian cancer were prospectively followed over 2 years. The level of importance they ascribed to four chemotherapy outcomes and their beliefs about cure were assessed. Their doctors independently specified intent of successive treatments. Results: Approximately half (54%) of newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients (65% with residual disease >2 cm and 49% with no or ≤2 cm residual disease) ranked 'tumour shrinkage (or decrease in blood levels of CA125)' as 'most important' during first-line chemotherapy. Approximately two thirds (65-70%) of all women whose disease had relapsed also ranked 'tumour shrinkage' as 'most important' during repeated chemotherapy. Few women (
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)943-949
    Number of pages6
    JournalSupportive Care in Cancer
    Volume18
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2010

    Keywords

    • Belief in cure
    • Chemotherapy
    • Oncology
    • Ovarian cancer
    • Treatment goals and understanding

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ranked importance of outcomes of first-line versus repeated chemotherapy among ovarian cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this