TY - JOUR
T1 - Ratings of age of acquisition of 299 words across 25 languages
T2 - Is there a cross-linguistic order of words?
AU - Łuniewska, Magdalena
AU - Haman, Ewa
AU - Armon-Lotem, Sharon
AU - Etenkowski, Bartłomiej
AU - Southwood, Frenette
AU - Anđelković, Darinka
AU - Blom, Elma
AU - Boerma, Tessel
AU - Chiat, Shula
AU - de Abreu, Pascale Engel
AU - Gagarina, Natalia
AU - Gavarró, Anna
AU - Håkansson, Gisela
AU - Hickey, Tina
AU - de López, Kristine Jensen
AU - Marinis, Theodoros
AU - Popović, Maša
AU - Thordardottir, Elin
AU - Blažienė, Agnė
AU - Sánchez, Myriam Cantú
AU - Dabašinskienė, Ineta
AU - Ege, Pınar
AU - Ehret, Inger Anne
AU - Fritsche, Nelly Ann
AU - Gatt, Daniela
AU - Janssen, Bibi
AU - Kambanaros, Maria
AU - Kapalková, Svetlana
AU - Kronqvist, Bjarke
AU - Kunnari, Sari
AU - Levorato, Chiara
AU - Nenonen, Olga
AU - Fhlannchadha, Siobhán Nic
AU - O’Toole, Ciara
AU - Polisenska, Kamila
AU - Pomiechowska, Barbara
AU - Ringblom, Natalia
AU - Rinker, Tanja
AU - Roch, Maja
AU - Savić, Maja
AU - Slančová, Daniela
AU - Tsimpli, Ianthi Maria
AU - Ünal-Logacev, Özlem
PY - 2015/8/15
Y1 - 2015/8/15
N2 - We present a new set of subjective age-of-acquisition (AoA) ratings for 299 words (158 nouns, 141 verbs) in 25 languages from five language families (Afro-Asiatic: Semitic languages; Altaic: one Turkic language: Indo-European: Baltic, Celtic, Germanic, Hellenic, Slavic, and Romance languages; Niger-Congo: one Bantu language; Uralic: Finnic and Ugric languages). Adult native speakers reported the age at which they had learned each word. We present a comparison of the AoA ratings across all languages by contrasting them in pairs. This comparison shows a consistency in the orders of ratings across the 25 languages. The data were then analyzed (1) to ascertain how the demographic characteristics of the participants influenced AoA estimations and (2) to assess differences caused by the exact form of the target question (when did you learn vs. when do children learn this word); (3) to compare the ratings obtained in our study to those of previous studies; and (4) to assess the validity of our study by comparison with quasi-objective AoA norms derived from the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MB-CDI). All 299 words were judged as being acquired early (mostly before the age of 6 years). AoA ratings were associated with the raters’ social or language status, but not with the raters’ age or education. Parents reported words as being learned earlier, and bilinguals reported learning them later. Estimations of the age at which children learn the words revealed significantly lower ratings of AoA. Finally, comparisons with previous AoA and MB-CDI norms support the validity of the present estimations. Our AoA ratings are available for research or other purposes.
AB - We present a new set of subjective age-of-acquisition (AoA) ratings for 299 words (158 nouns, 141 verbs) in 25 languages from five language families (Afro-Asiatic: Semitic languages; Altaic: one Turkic language: Indo-European: Baltic, Celtic, Germanic, Hellenic, Slavic, and Romance languages; Niger-Congo: one Bantu language; Uralic: Finnic and Ugric languages). Adult native speakers reported the age at which they had learned each word. We present a comparison of the AoA ratings across all languages by contrasting them in pairs. This comparison shows a consistency in the orders of ratings across the 25 languages. The data were then analyzed (1) to ascertain how the demographic characteristics of the participants influenced AoA estimations and (2) to assess differences caused by the exact form of the target question (when did you learn vs. when do children learn this word); (3) to compare the ratings obtained in our study to those of previous studies; and (4) to assess the validity of our study by comparison with quasi-objective AoA norms derived from the MacArthur–Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MB-CDI). All 299 words were judged as being acquired early (mostly before the age of 6 years). AoA ratings were associated with the raters’ social or language status, but not with the raters’ age or education. Parents reported words as being learned earlier, and bilinguals reported learning them later. Estimations of the age at which children learn the words revealed significantly lower ratings of AoA. Finally, comparisons with previous AoA and MB-CDI norms support the validity of the present estimations. Our AoA ratings are available for research or other purposes.
KW - Age of acquisition
KW - AoA
KW - Cross-linguistic comparison
KW - Subjective ratings
KW - Words
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939227410&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6
DO - 10.3758/s13428-015-0636-6
M3 - Article
SN - 1554-351X
VL - 48
SP - 1154
EP - 1177
JO - Behavior Research Methods
JF - Behavior Research Methods
IS - 3
ER -