TY - JOUR
T1 - Re-thinking public health
T2 - Towards a new scientific logic of routine animal health care in European industrial farming
AU - Bellet, Camille
AU - Hamilton, Lindsay
AU - Rushton, Jonathan
N1 - Funding Information:
CB currently receives funding from the Wellcome Trust as part of her Wellcome Trust Research Fellowship in Humanities and Social Science [219799/Z/19/Z] and is hugely grateful for Wellcome’s ongoing support. The fieldwork of this research has received financial support from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Programme for research, technological development, and demonstration [633184]. The authors would like to thank all the participants for their collaboration; Isabelle Schwartz-Cornil, Marie-Hélène Pinard-van der Laan, Jean-François Valarcher, Didier Raboisson and Jean-Christophe Audonnet for their help in recruiting participants; Lucie Fornili for supporting data collection; Bernadette Mallon for transcribing interviews; Barbara Ribeiro for providing critical comments on an earlier draft of this manuscript; and the anonymous peer reviewers for their insightful feedback.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - This study makes the case for a new scientific logic of routine animal health care in industrial farming in Europe. We argue that the social regime underpinning scientific research and development on chronic animal disease management (CADM) in Europe stifles innovation and sustains a productivist model of animal husbandry that facilitates and maintains chronic animal diseases rather than eliminating them. Drawing on documentary analysis and qualitative interviews, the study explores the science of CADM in the broiler, cattle and pig sectors of the European food industry. Our findings show that in these major sectors, research and development on CADM is largely orientated towards a logic of growth, profitability and control rather than a recognition of the interconnection between chronic animal diseases, the food industry, and people (especially consumers) as advocated by the One Health approach. The study contributes to the literature on medical humanities and science and technology studies within One Health and public health in two ways: First, we draw new focus towards chronic animal diseases that are non-transmissible to humans and argue that while these are not zoonoses, they are equally worthy of attention for managing the emergence of new pathogens and diseases. Second, we expand the conceptualisation of One Health to include chronic animal health conditions. Our argument is that public health as an outcome of the One Health approach should be a term of reference that applies to humans and nonhumans alike whether they be farmed animals, practitioners or consumers.
AB - This study makes the case for a new scientific logic of routine animal health care in industrial farming in Europe. We argue that the social regime underpinning scientific research and development on chronic animal disease management (CADM) in Europe stifles innovation and sustains a productivist model of animal husbandry that facilitates and maintains chronic animal diseases rather than eliminating them. Drawing on documentary analysis and qualitative interviews, the study explores the science of CADM in the broiler, cattle and pig sectors of the European food industry. Our findings show that in these major sectors, research and development on CADM is largely orientated towards a logic of growth, profitability and control rather than a recognition of the interconnection between chronic animal diseases, the food industry, and people (especially consumers) as advocated by the One Health approach. The study contributes to the literature on medical humanities and science and technology studies within One Health and public health in two ways: First, we draw new focus towards chronic animal diseases that are non-transmissible to humans and argue that while these are not zoonoses, they are equally worthy of attention for managing the emergence of new pathogens and diseases. Second, we expand the conceptualisation of One Health to include chronic animal health conditions. Our argument is that public health as an outcome of the One Health approach should be a term of reference that applies to humans and nonhumans alike whether they be farmed animals, practitioners or consumers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115438440&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1057/s41599-021-00890-y
DO - 10.1057/s41599-021-00890-y
M3 - Article
SN - 2662-9992
VL - 8
SP - 1
EP - 11
JO - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
JF - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
IS - 1
M1 - 214
ER -