"Reader, I detained him under the mental health act": A literary response to professor fennell's best interests and treatment for mental disorder

David Gurnham

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    49 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This is a response to Professor Fennell's paper on the recent influence and impact of the best interests test on the treatment of patients detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 (MHA) for mental disorder. I discuss two points of general ethical significance raised by Professor Fennell. Firstly, I consider his argument on the breadth of the best interests test, incorporating as it does factors considerably wider than those of medical justifications and the risk of harm. Secondly, I discuss his contention that the apparent permeability of the line between the interests of the patient and the interests of society is something to be concerned about in itself. Since the overarching theme of the paper is the proper place of social and cultural values, my reponse considers the implications of Fennell's arguments in the light of Charlotte Brontë's novel 'Jane Eyre', which, through the character of Bertha Mason (the infamous 'mad woman in the attic') provides a provocative study of the relationship between mental disorder and society. © 2008 The Author(s).
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)268-278
    Number of pages10
    JournalHealth Care Analysis
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2008

    Keywords

    • Best interests
    • Consent
    • Mental Capacity Act
    • Mental disorder
    • Mental Health Act
    • Treatment

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of '"Reader, I detained him under the mental health act": A literary response to professor fennell's best interests and treatment for mental disorder'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this