Abstract
Background: In HDR brachytherapy precision of catheter implantation is crucial for conformal treatment planning as a starting point for better optimization process.
Aim: The aim was to investigate differences between virtual and real needle position and the effect of needle displacement on dosimetric parameters as a function of prostate volume for better evaluation of "real" implant with respect to final dose distribution.
Materials/Methods: Thirty treatment plans calculated by Nucletron SWIFT™ were randomly selected. Dosimetric data including V100 for prostate gland and D10 for urethra were analyzed as a function of prostate volume and needle displacement. Needle displacement was determined by measuring the distance between virtual and real positions of respective needles in three sectional images: at the base, apex of the prostate gland and reference image. Dosimetric parameters were determined for consecutive computer plans: virtual (before implantation), live (after implantation and renewed optimization). For the purpose of this study a new parameter, VD (Volume-Dose), was created.
Results: VD indicates the quality of "real" dose distribution with respect to "virtual" treatment plan. In order to realize the assumption of virtual plan (VD<1) for a given prostate volume, mean values of needle displacement r should not exceed racceptable according to the formula: racceptable (Vp) ∝ Vp2. For larger glands (above 30cc) final dose distribution is less dependent on needle displacement than smaller ones.
Conclusions: The experiment determined maximum values of needle displacement for a given Vp parameter, allowing one to take advantage of optimization algorithms and to improve the final dose distribution.
Aim: The aim was to investigate differences between virtual and real needle position and the effect of needle displacement on dosimetric parameters as a function of prostate volume for better evaluation of "real" implant with respect to final dose distribution.
Materials/Methods: Thirty treatment plans calculated by Nucletron SWIFT™ were randomly selected. Dosimetric data including V100 for prostate gland and D10 for urethra were analyzed as a function of prostate volume and needle displacement. Needle displacement was determined by measuring the distance between virtual and real positions of respective needles in three sectional images: at the base, apex of the prostate gland and reference image. Dosimetric parameters were determined for consecutive computer plans: virtual (before implantation), live (after implantation and renewed optimization). For the purpose of this study a new parameter, VD (Volume-Dose), was created.
Results: VD indicates the quality of "real" dose distribution with respect to "virtual" treatment plan. In order to realize the assumption of virtual plan (VD<1) for a given prostate volume, mean values of needle displacement r should not exceed racceptable according to the formula: racceptable (Vp) ∝ Vp2. For larger glands (above 30cc) final dose distribution is less dependent on needle displacement than smaller ones.
Conclusions: The experiment determined maximum values of needle displacement for a given Vp parameter, allowing one to take advantage of optimization algorithms and to improve the final dose distribution.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 9-14 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 29 Feb 2008 |
Keywords
- Interstitial implant
- Prostate volume
- Real-time brachytherapy
