Abstract
In two experiments, we investigated whether people reason differently when they reason about emotional and neutral contents. We gave participants a conditional reasoning task ("If p, then q") and varied the emotionality of the items used as p and q. Participants were asked to draw inferences based on these statements. In Experiment 1, we compared statements including preexisting emotional and neutral words. In Experiment 2, we experimentally manipulated the emotionality of initially neutral words using classical conditioning. In both experiments, emotionality affected participants' responses. They were more likely to draw invalid inferences in response to emotional compared with neutral statements.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 745-752 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Psychological Science |
Volume | 15 |
Issue number | 11 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Nov 2004 |