Reasoning by Analogy in Inductive Logic

Alexandra Hill, Michal Pelis (Editor), Vit Puncochar (Editor)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

The best known examples of rational probability functions exclude the possibility of argument by analogy, and attempts to find alternative classes of functions have had limited success. In this paper we explicate a notion of similarity that derives from the sharing of identical properties and propose an Analogy Principle (AP) based on this notion. We then classify the probability functions that satisfy AP (in the presence of some other widely accepted principles of rationality) for languages with at most four mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive outcomes (as in the Wheel of Fortune case) and show that there are no solutions to AP for larger languages. In light of this, we conclude by suggesting a modification of the principle and noting that it remains an open problem to provide the full classification of probability functions that satisfy it.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Logica Yearbook 2011
EditorsMichal Pelis, Vit Puncochar
Place of PublicationLondon
PublisherCollege Publications
Pages63-76
Number of pages14
Publication statusPublished - 23 May 2012
EventLogica 24th International Symposium - Hejnice Monastery
Duration: 20 Jun 201124 Jun 2011

Conference

ConferenceLogica 24th International Symposium
CityHejnice Monastery
Period20/06/1124/06/11

Keywords

  • analogy, wheel of fortune, inductive logic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reasoning by Analogy in Inductive Logic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this