Recovery of hypoglycemia awareness in long-standing type 1 diabetes: a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial comparing insulin pump with multiple daily injections and continuous with conventional glucose self-monitoring (HypoCOMPaSS)

Stuart A Little, Lalantha Leelarathna, Emma Walkinshaw, Horng Kai Tan, Olivia Chapple, Alexandra Lubina-Solomon, Thomas J Chadwick, Shalleen Barendse, Deborah D Stocken, Catherine Brennand, Sally M Marshall, Ruth Wood, Jane Speight, David Kerr, Daniel Flanagan, Simon R Heller, Mark L Evans, James A M Shaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether impaired awareness of hypoglycemia (IAH) can be improved and severe hypoglycemia (SH) prevented in type 1 diabetes, we compared an insulin pump (continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion [CSII]) with multiple daily injections (MDIs) and adjuvant real-time continuous glucose monitoring (RT) with conventional self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A 24-week 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial in adults with type 1 diabetes and IAH was conducted. All received comparable education, support, and congruent therapeutic targets aimed at rigorous avoidance of biochemical hypoglycemia without relaxing overall control. Primary end point was between-intervention difference in 24-week hypoglycemia awareness (Gold score).

RESULTS: A total of 96 participants (mean diabetes duration 29 years) were randomized. Overall, biochemical hypoglycemia (≤3.0 mmol/L) decreased (53 ± 63 to 24 ± 56 min/24 h; P = 0.004 [t test]) without deterioration in HbA1c. Hypoglycemia awareness improved (5.1 ± 1.1 to 4.1 ± 1.6; P = 0.0001 [t test]) with decreased SH (8.9 ± 13.4 to 0.8 ± 1.8 episodes/patient-year; P = 0.0001 [t test]). At 24 weeks, there was no significant difference in awareness comparing CSII with MDI (4.1 ± 1.6 vs. 4.2 ± 1.7; difference 0.1; 95% CI -0.6 to 0.8) and RT with SMBG (4.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.0 ± 1.7; difference -0.3; 95% CI -1.0 to 0.4). Between-group analyses demonstrated comparable reductions in SH, fear of hypoglycemia, and insulin doses with equivalent HbA1c. Treatment satisfaction was higher with CSII than MDI (32 ± 3 vs. 29 ± 6; P = 0.0003 [t test]), but comparable with SMBG and RT (30 ± 5 vs. 30 ± 5; P = 0.79 [t test]).

CONCLUSIONS: Hypoglycemia awareness can be improved and recurrent SH prevented in long-standing type 1 diabetes without relaxing HbA1c. Similar biomedical outcomes can be attained with conventional MDI and SMBG regimens compared with CSII/RT, although satisfaction was higher with CSII.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2114-2122
Number of pages9
JournalDiabetes Care
Volume37
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2014

Keywords

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Awareness
  • Blood Glucose/metabolism
  • Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1/blood
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Glycated Hemoglobin A/metabolism
  • Humans
  • Hypoglycemia/blood
  • Hypoglycemic Agents/administration & dosage
  • Infusions, Subcutaneous
  • Injections
  • Insulin/administration & dosage
  • Insulin Infusion Systems
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Recurrence
  • Young Adult

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recovery of hypoglycemia awareness in long-standing type 1 diabetes: a multicenter 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial comparing insulin pump with multiple daily injections and continuous with conventional glucose self-monitoring (HypoCOMPaSS)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this