Recruitment to a trial of self-care skills training in long-term health conditions: Analysis of the impact of patient attitudes and preferences

Peter Bower, Anne Kennedy, David Reeves, Claire Gately, Victoria Lee, Anne Rogers

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    The rise of evidence-based practice has highlighted the importance of effective recruitment to randomised controlled trials if studies are to be adequately powered and valid. However, there are also increasing concerns about patient preferences and choice within trials. The current authors are involved in a trial of a programme to provide self-care skills training for people with long-term health conditions (the 'Expert Patients Programme'), and during the design stage there were significant concerns about the impact of patient preferences on the feasibility and validity of the study, because recruitment required that patients risk randomisation to a waiting list control group. This paper first details the issues raised in this trial, and the methods used to attempt to overcome them. Data on recruitment rates, loss to follow up and patient decision making about participation are presented, which suggested that initial assumptions about the impact of patient preferences were incorrect. Key lessons concerning preferences in this patient population and related issues in trial administration are then discussed. © 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)49-56
    Number of pages7
    JournalContemporary Clinical Trials
    Volume27
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2006

    Keywords

    • Chronic disease
    • Long-term health condition
    • Patient perceptions
    • Patient preferences
    • Randomised controlled trial
    • Recruitment
    • Self-care
    • Trial participation

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Recruitment to a trial of self-care skills training in long-term health conditions: Analysis of the impact of patient attitudes and preferences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this